tipitup wrote: ↑

December 12th, 2024, 4:26 pm

aggies22 wrote: ↑

December 12th, 2024, 4:25 pm

Bullnamed_gus wrote: ↑

December 12th, 2024, 4:24 pm

aggies22 wrote: ↑

December 12th, 2024, 4:20 pm

Bullnamed_gus wrote: ↑

December 12th, 2024, 4:09 pm

@aggies22 when should we expects the purge on the Offensive Side of the ball, will it be as drastic? IE Wiping out complete position groups? haha.

I would imagine sometime soon. We currently have 3 linebackers, 3 cornerbacks, 3 safeties, and 1 special teamer on our roster.

Innovative defense Nick Howell is running. only need 9 players.

Cutting edge stuff.

no don't need edge stuff!!

Just need the Man Stuff

FromLItoLogan wrote: ↑

December 12th, 2024, 4:09 pm

Turner is gonna get some P4 interest. I was hoping to keep him but not surprised he's going.

Hmm. Maybe but I doubt it. He does have a huge upside but far from P4 ready in my eyes. Huge difference between he and Faison. Faison could have started for about any team in the country.

Bullnamed_gus wrote: ↑

December 12th, 2024, 3:56 pm

FUUUUUUU!?!! This is the only one I didn't want to see on perhaps the entire team.

Elkaggie wrote:

FromLItoLogan wrote: ↑

December 12th, 2024, 4:09 pm

Turner is gonna get some P4 interest. I was hoping to keep him but not surprised he's going.

Hmm. Maybe but I doubt it. He does have a huge upside but far from P4 ready in my eyes. Huge difference between he and Faison. Faison could have started for about any team in the country.

I agree with this. He may get a P4 offer to be a depth guy. He should have stuck around another year. I was actually really impressed with Jameson in the limited carries he had. He runs hard and physical and runs downhill. I hope he sticks around. Wouldn’t be surprised if we pick up the back up Lobo’s RB Rogers. We also hopefully have a Healthy Briggs

AGGIEinIOWA wrote: ↑

December 12th, 2024, 7:50 pm

Elkaggie wrote:

FromLItoLogan wrote: ↑

December 12th, 2024, 4:09 pm

Turner is gonna get some P4 interest. I was hoping to keep him but not surprised he's going.

Hmm. Maybe but I doubt it. He does have a huge upside but far from P4 ready in my eyes. Huge difference between he and Faison. Faison could have started for about any team in the country.

I agree with this. He may get a P4 offer to be a depth guy. He should have stuck around another year. I was actually really impressed with Jameson in the limited carries he had. He runs hard and physical and runs downhill. I hope he sticks around. Wouldn’t be surprised if we pick up the back up Lobo’s RB Rogers. We also hopefully have a Healthy Briggs

Losing Turner hurts less knowing what D-Jam can do. If Briggs comes back full speed that’s still a legit backfield with those two. Floyd even looked good in his few plays. Hopefully these guys don’t get cut.

AGGIEinIOWA wrote: ↑

December 12th, 2024, 7:50 pm

Elkaggie wrote:

FromLItoLogan wrote: ↑

December 12th, 2024, 4:09 pm

Turner is gonna get some P4 interest. I was hoping to keep him but not surprised he's going.

Hmm. Maybe but I doubt it. He does have a huge upside but far from P4 ready in my eyes. Huge difference between he and Faison. Faison could have started for about any team in the country.

I agree with this. He may get a P4 offer to be a depth guy. He should have stuck around another year. I was actually really impressed with Jameson in the limited carries he had. He runs hard and physical and runs downhill. I hope he sticks around. Wouldn’t be surprised if we pick up the back up Lobo’s RB Rogers. We also hopefully have a Healthy Briggs

As long as we can keep the majority of our O-line intact, our run game should be solid next year.

Any chance that we land the New Mexico running back that was offered by us and the Utes?

I imagine this is the 9th quitter? @aggies22

Hoot wrote: ↑

December 12th, 2024, 7:53 pm

AGGIEinIOWA wrote: ↑

December 12th, 2024, 7:50 pm

Elkaggie wrote:

FromLItoLogan wrote: ↑

December 12th, 2024, 4:09 pm

Turner is gonna get some P4 interest. I was hoping to keep him but not surprised he's going.

Hmm. Maybe but I doubt it. He does have a huge upside but far from P4 ready in my eyes. Huge difference between he and Faison. Faison could have started for about any team in the country.

I agree with this. He may get a P4 offer to be a depth guy. He should have stuck around another year. I was actually really impressed with Jameson in the limited carries he had. He runs hard and physical and runs downhill. I hope he sticks around. Wouldn’t be surprised if we pick up the back up Lobo’s RB Rogers. We also hopefully have a Healthy Briggs

Losing Turner hurts less knowing what D-Jam can do. If Briggs comes back full speed that’s still a legit backfield with those two. Floyd even looked good in his few plays. Hopefully these guys don’t get cut.

I hate to see Turner go. He has lots of upside.

Bullnamed_gus wrote: ↑

December 13th, 2024, 12:56 pm

I imagine this is the 9th quitter? @aggies22

Nope. He actually missed the season with a legitimate injury. Same with Enoka Migao.

New world of College Sports is RUTHLESS.

With how many players the new staff is kicking off, they better have A LOT of good players ready to commit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bullnamed_gus wrote: ↑

December 13th, 2024, 3:43 pm

New world of College Sports is RUTHLESS.

Dangit
I was excited about him
BIG strong boy who could move really well.

Bronco you better know what youre doing!

What a chicken (I can't express myself without swearing) move by new coaching staff. Where’s your honor, integrity, and loyalty to these guys. What happened with DS supposedly guaranteeing the new commits would still have a spot here. Coach em up. We can win with these guys. I think it’s a piss poor move that it can even be allowed.

PIGSKINAGGIE wrote:What a chicken (I can't express myself without swearing) move by new coaching staff. Where’s your honor, integrity, and loyalty to these guys. What happened with DS supposedly guaranteeing the new commits would still have a spot here. Coach em up. We can win with these guys. I think it’s a piss poor move that it can even be allowed.

Yeah where is DS in all this ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2004AG wrote: ↑

December 14th, 2024, 1:30 am

PIGSKINAGGIE wrote:What a chicken (I can't express myself without swearing) move by new coaching staff. Where’s your honor, integrity, and loyalty to these guys. What happened with DS supposedly guaranteeing the new commits would still have a spot here. Coach em up. We can win with these guys. I think it’s a piss poor move that it can even be allowed.

Yeah where is DS in all this ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's NOT her call.

2004AG wrote:

PIGSKINAGGIE wrote:What a chicken (I can't express myself without swearing) move by new coaching staff. Where’s your honor, integrity, and loyalty to these guys. What happened with DS supposedly guaranteeing the new commits would still have a spot here. Coach em up. We can win with these guys. I think it’s a piss poor move that it can even be allowed.

Yeah where is DS in all this ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hopefully out raising money and not meddling in decisions that the coach she hired is supposed to make.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

PIGSKINAGGIE wrote:What a chicken (I can't express myself without swearing) move by new coaching staff. Where’s your honor, integrity, and loyalty to these guys. What happened with DS supposedly guaranteeing the new commits would still have a spot here. Coach em up. We can win with these guys. I think it’s a piss poor move that it can even be allowed.

Yeah where is DS in all this ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hopefully out raising money and not meddling in decisions that the coach she hired is supposed to make.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I get that.

But when these guys were committing I feel like she could have and should have honored their scholarships for this season.

Or else, what was even the point of the last staff to bother recruiting at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

aggies22 wrote:

2004AG wrote: ↑

December 14th, 2024, 1:30 am

PIGSKINAGGIE wrote:What a chicken (I can't express myself without swearing) move by new coaching staff. Where’s your honor, integrity, and loyalty to these guys. What happened with DS supposedly guaranteeing the new commits would still have a spot here. Coach em up. We can win with these guys. I think it’s a piss poor move that it can even be allowed.

Yeah where is DS in all this ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's NOT her call.

Technically everything is her call.

I think during the hiring process she could have told bronco she had told recruits that their scholarships would be honored.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2004AG wrote:

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

PIGSKINAGGIE wrote:What a chicken (I can't express myself without swearing) move by new coaching staff. Where’s your honor, integrity, and loyalty to these guys. What happened with DS supposedly guaranteeing the new commits would still have a spot here. Coach em up. We can win with these guys. I think it’s a piss poor move that it can even be allowed.

Yeah where is DS in all this ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hopefully out raising money and not meddling in decisions that the coach she hired is supposed to make.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I get that.

But when these guys were committing I feel like she could have and should have honored their scholarships for this season.

Or else, what was even the point of the last staff to bother recruiting at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She had three options.

1. Disallow the staff to recruit until she knew what direction she was going.

2. Allow the staff that was also interviewing to keep the job to continue to recruit and let the eventual coaching staff make decisions on what they think is best for their success.

3. Allow the current staff to recruit and then handcuff the eventual staff to those recruits, essentially playing a major role in the eventual staff’s recruiting decisions.

Which of these are you proposing?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

PIGSKINAGGIE wrote:What a chicken (I can't express myself without swearing) move by new coaching staff. Where’s your honor, integrity, and loyalty to these guys. What happened with DS supposedly guaranteeing the new commits would still have a spot here. Coach em up. We can win with these guys. I think it’s a piss poor move that it can even be allowed.

Yeah where is DS in all this ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hopefully out raising money and not meddling in decisions that the coach she hired is supposed to make.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I get that.

But when these guys were committing I feel like she could have and should have honored their scholarships for this season.

Or else, what was even the point of the last staff to bother recruiting at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She had three options.

1. Disallow the staff to recruit until she knew what direction she was going.

2. Allow the staff that was also interviewing to keep the job to continue to recruit and let the eventual coaching staff make decisions on what they think is best for their success.

3. Allow the current staff to recruit and then handcuff the eventual staff to those recruits, essentially playing a major role in the eventual staff’s recruiting decisions.

Which of these are you proposing?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Easy. #3

Here’s why: this probably only affects 2-3 kids. By doing #3 you don’t burn bridges and piss off local Utah high school programs and in reality on a roster of 85 kids what’s 2-3 spots anyways. It isn’t a big deal. And in this case, the kid had P4 offers.

Bronco is soooooooooo good at evaluating kids that this will end with replacing him with a scrub from New Mexico or a kid with offers to Black Hills State.

It pisses off the bronco fan boys, but I can call balls and strikes too. Bronco is making a few poor decisions since getting the job, IMO.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2004AG wrote:

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

PIGSKINAGGIE wrote:What a chicken (I can't express myself without swearing) move by new coaching staff. Where’s your honor, integrity, and loyalty to these guys. What happened with DS supposedly guaranteeing the new commits would still have a spot here. Coach em up. We can win with these guys. I think it’s a piss poor move that it can even be allowed.

Yeah where is DS in all this ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hopefully out raising money and not meddling in decisions that the coach she hired is supposed to make.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I get that.

But when these guys were committing I feel like she could have and should have honored their scholarships for this season.

Or else, what was even the point of the last staff to bother recruiting at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She had three options.

1. Disallow the staff to recruit until she knew what direction she was going.

2. Allow the staff that was also interviewing to keep the job to continue to recruit and let the eventual coaching staff make decisions on what they think is best for their success.

3. Allow the current staff to recruit and then handcuff the eventual staff to those recruits, essentially playing a major role in the eventual staff’s recruiting decisions.

Which of these are you proposing?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Easy. #3

Here’s why: this probably only affects 2-3 kids. By doing #3 you don’t burn bridges and piss off local Utah high school programs and in reality on a roster of 85 kids what’s 2-3 spots anyways. It isn’t a big deal. And in this case, the kid had P4 offers.

Bronco is soooooooooo good at evaluating kids that this will end with replacing him with a scrub from New Mexico or a kid with offers to Black Hills State.

It pisses off the bronco fan boys, but I can call balls and strikes too. Bronco is making a few poor decisions since getting the job, IMO.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, but you are leaving out the bridges that would be burned with your new coach and staff, either during the hiring process, if that’s when it is discussed, or after. I can’t imagine there are many FBS coaches that are out there demanding $2M/year salary that are going to also sign off on that situation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

tetonaggie wrote: ↑

December 14th, 2024, 1:26 pm

2004AG wrote:

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

PIGSKINAGGIE wrote:What a chicken (I can't express myself without swearing) move by new coaching staff. Where’s your honor, integrity, and loyalty to these guys. What happened with DS supposedly guaranteeing the new commits would still have a spot here. Coach em up. We can win with these guys. I think it’s a piss poor move that it can even be allowed.

Yeah where is DS in all this ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hopefully out raising money and not meddling in decisions that the coach she hired is supposed to make.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I get that.

But when these guys were committing I feel like she could have and should have honored their scholarships for this season.

Or else, what was even the point of the last staff to bother recruiting at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She had three options.

1. Disallow the staff to recruit until she knew what direction she was going.

2. Allow the staff that was also interviewing to keep the job to continue to recruit and let the eventual coaching staff make decisions on what they think is best for their success.

3. Allow the current staff to recruit and then handcuff the eventual staff to those recruits, essentially playing a major role in the eventual staff’s recruiting decisions.

Which of these are you proposing?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It should have been understood during the interview process, that all recruits had a place here and if they wanted to still be here after the coaching change that they would be accepted if they committed. That’s not too much to ask. Especially with all the players we are going to lose now, and again in the spring. There is going to be plenty of openings for the few guys who still wanted to be here. I want guys who want to be here and be Aggies and if they still feel that way, we should be committed to them. Otherwise, what the hell was the point of even being out recruiting with the old staff that we knew damn well wasn’t going to be here.

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

PIGSKINAGGIE wrote:What a chicken (I can't express myself without swearing) move by new coaching staff. Where’s your honor, integrity, and loyalty to these guys. What happened with DS supposedly guaranteeing the new commits would still have a spot here. Coach em up. We can win with these guys. I think it’s a piss poor move that it can even be allowed.

Yeah where is DS in all this ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hopefully out raising money and not meddling in decisions that the coach she hired is supposed to make.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I get that.

But when these guys were committing I feel like she could have and should have honored their scholarships for this season.

Or else, what was even the point of the last staff to bother recruiting at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She had three options.

1. Disallow the staff to recruit until she knew what direction she was going.

2. Allow the staff that was also interviewing to keep the job to continue to recruit and let the eventual coaching staff make decisions on what they think is best for their success.

3. Allow the current staff to recruit and then handcuff the eventual staff to those recruits, essentially playing a major role in the eventual staff’s recruiting decisions.

Which of these are you proposing?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Easy. #3

Here’s why: this probably only affects 2-3 kids. By doing #3 you don’t burn bridges and piss off local Utah high school programs and in reality on a roster of 85 kids what’s 2-3 spots anyways. It isn’t a big deal. And in this case, the kid had P4 offers.

Bronco is soooooooooo good at evaluating kids that this will end with replacing him with a scrub from New Mexico or a kid with offers to Black Hills State.

It pisses off the bronco fan boys, but I can call balls and strikes too. Bronco is making a few poor decisions since getting the job, IMO.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, but you are leaving out the bridges that would be burned with your new coach and staff, either during the hiring process, if that’s when it is discussed, or after. I can’t imagine there are many FBS coaches that are out there demanding $2M/year salary that are going to also sign off on that situation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I will add, you can be critical of the decisions Bronco and staff are making here, for sure, but not DS, she has no business making direct recruiting decisions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

tetonaggie wrote: ↑

December 14th, 2024, 1:54 pm

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

PIGSKINAGGIE wrote:What a chicken (I can't express myself without swearing) move by new coaching staff. Where’s your honor, integrity, and loyalty to these guys. What happened with DS supposedly guaranteeing the new commits would still have a spot here. Coach em up. We can win with these guys. I think it’s a piss poor move that it can even be allowed.

Yeah where is DS in all this ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hopefully out raising money and not meddling in decisions that the coach she hired is supposed to make.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I get that.

But when these guys were committing I feel like she could have and should have honored their scholarships for this season.

Or else, what was even the point of the last staff to bother recruiting at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She had three options.

1. Disallow the staff to recruit until she knew what direction she was going.

2. Allow the staff that was also interviewing to keep the job to continue to recruit and let the eventual coaching staff make decisions on what they think is best for their success.

3. Allow the current staff to recruit and then handcuff the eventual staff to those recruits, essentially playing a major role in the eventual staff’s recruiting decisions.

Which of these are you proposing?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Easy. #3

Here’s why: this probably only affects 2-3 kids. By doing #3 you don’t burn bridges and piss off local Utah high school programs and in reality on a roster of 85 kids what’s 2-3 spots anyways. It isn’t a big deal. And in this case, the kid had P4 offers.

Bronco is soooooooooo good at evaluating kids that this will end with replacing him with a scrub from New Mexico or a kid with offers to Black Hills State.

It pisses off the bronco fan boys, but I can call balls and strikes too. Bronco is making a few poor decisions since getting the job, IMO.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, but you are leaving out the bridges that would be burned with your new coach and staff, either during the hiring process, if that’s when it is discussed, or after. I can’t imagine there are many FBS coaches that are out there demanding $2M/year salary that are going to also sign off on that situation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I will add, you can be critical of the decisions Bronco and staff are making here, for sure, but not DS, she has no business making direct recruiting decisions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not even if Dreiling asked her if he could make that claim and she said he could?

tetonaggie wrote:

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

PIGSKINAGGIE wrote:What a chicken (I can't express myself without swearing) move by new coaching staff. Where’s your honor, integrity, and loyalty to these guys. What happened with DS supposedly guaranteeing the new commits would still have a spot here. Coach em up. We can win with these guys. I think it’s a piss poor move that it can even be allowed.

Yeah where is DS in all this ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hopefully out raising money and not meddling in decisions that the coach she hired is supposed to make.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I get that.

But when these guys were committing I feel like she could have and should have honored their scholarships for this season.

Or else, what was even the point of the last staff to bother recruiting at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She had three options.

1. Disallow the staff to recruit until she knew what direction she was going.

2. Allow the staff that was also interviewing to keep the job to continue to recruit and let the eventual coaching staff make decisions on what they think is best for their success.

3. Allow the current staff to recruit and then handcuff the eventual staff to those recruits, essentially playing a major role in the eventual staff’s recruiting decisions.

Which of these are you proposing?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Easy. #3

Here’s why: this probably only affects 2-3 kids. By doing #3 you don’t burn bridges and piss off local Utah high school programs and in reality on a roster of 85 kids what’s 2-3 spots anyways. It isn’t a big deal. And in this case, the kid had P4 offers.

Bronco is soooooooooo good at evaluating kids that this will end with replacing him with a scrub from New Mexico or a kid with offers to Black Hills State.

It pisses off the bronco fan boys, but I can call balls and strikes too. Bronco is making a few poor decisions since getting the job, IMO.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, but you are leaving out the bridges that would be burned with your new coach and staff, either during the hiring process, if that’s when it is discussed, or after. I can’t imagine there are many FBS coaches that are out there demanding $2M/year salary that are going to also sign off on that situation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I will add, you can be critical of the decisions Bronco and staff are making here, for sure, but not DS, she has no business making direct recruiting decisions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not “direct” recruiting decisions but could make indirect recruiting decisions and tell recruits their scholarship offers would be honored?

I got the impression 22 said they would be. Did we misunderstand ? Or did something change ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Another one:

https://x.com/braydonbailey2/status/186 ... nFhZP8J39w

aggie_in_NC wrote: ↑

December 14th, 2024, 4:02 pm

Another one:

https://x.com/braydonbailey2/status/186 ... nFhZP8J39w

Not too impressed with his performance last year.

aggie_in_NC wrote: ↑

December 14th, 2024, 4:02 pm

Another one:

https://x.com/braydonbailey2/status/186 ... nFhZP8J39w

Wait, who??

tetonaggie wrote: ↑

December 14th, 2024, 1:54 pm

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

tetonaggie wrote:

2004AG wrote:

PIGSKINAGGIE wrote:What a chicken (I can't express myself without swearing) move by new coaching staff. Where’s your honor, integrity, and loyalty to these guys. What happened with DS supposedly guaranteeing the new commits would still have a spot here. Coach em up. We can win with these guys. I think it’s a piss poor move that it can even be allowed.

Yeah where is DS in all this ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hopefully out raising money and not meddling in decisions that the coach she hired is supposed to make.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I get that.

But when these guys were committing I feel like she could have and should have honored their scholarships for this season.

Or else, what was even the point of the last staff to bother recruiting at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She had three options.

1. Disallow the staff to recruit until she knew what direction she was going.

2. Allow the staff that was also interviewing to keep the job to continue to recruit and let the eventual coaching staff make decisions on what they think is best for their success.

3. Allow the current staff to recruit and then handcuff the eventual staff to those recruits, essentially playing a major role in the eventual staff’s recruiting decisions.

Which of these are you proposing?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Easy. #3

Here’s why: this probably only affects 2-3 kids. By doing #3 you don’t burn bridges and piss off local Utah high school programs and in reality on a roster of 85 kids what’s 2-3 spots anyways. It isn’t a big deal. And in this case, the kid had P4 offers.

Bronco is soooooooooo good at evaluating kids that this will end with replacing him with a scrub from New Mexico or a kid with offers to Black Hills State.

It pisses off the bronco fan boys, but I can call balls and strikes too. Bronco is making a few poor decisions since getting the job, IMO.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, but you are leaving out the bridges that would be burned with your new coach and staff, either during the hiring process, if that’s when it is discussed, or after. I can’t imagine there are many FBS coaches that are out there demanding $2M/year salary that are going to also sign off on that situation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I will add, you can be critical of the decisions Bronco and staff are making here, for sure, but not DS, she has no business making direct recruiting decisions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

100% agree, you don't hire a coach and then hamstring who he recruits or what coaches to keep. You let the new coach build the staff and players the way they want to.

Well it looks like our LB coach that came in and cleaned house of our LB room is no longer the LB coach. Maybe I am wrong that it wasnt him but her @aggies22 SHane hunter is no longer the LB coach. Which is weird, hes from Idaho Falls, youd think he would love to come.

Bullnamed_gus wrote: ↑

December 14th, 2024, 11:08 pm

Well it looks like our LB coach that came in and cleaned house of our LB room is no longer the LB coach. Maybe I am wrong that it wasnt him but her @aggies22 SHane hunter is no longer the LB coach. Which is weird, hes from Idaho Falls, youd think he would love to come.

I'm not sure Shane Hunter is/was here.

aggies22 wrote: ↑

December 14th, 2024, 11:32 pm

Bullnamed_gus wrote: ↑

December 14th, 2024, 11:08 pm

Well it looks like our LB coach that came in and cleaned house of our LB room is no longer the LB coach. Maybe I am wrong that it wasnt him but her @aggies22 SHane hunter is no longer the LB coach. Which is weird, hes from Idaho Falls, youd think he would love to come.

I'm not sure Shane Hunter is/was here.

Oh, I may have been mistaken, I thought he was the LB/ST coach, he did make an offer to someone, but its been radio silence since.

It seems as if the staff will be different overall than what was at New Mexico. Sure a lot of similar parts, but OC/QB, Oline, LBs, Special teams will all be different.