Football Home Game
Sat, August 31, 2024
Sat, August 31, 2024
Basketball Home Game
Fri, November 1, 2024
Fri, November 1, 2024
“Bonners on a short leash this week”
-
- Posts: 923
- Joined: January 19th, 2020, 4:57 pm
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 560 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
In other news Miami just benched their starting QB because he lost to somebody Miami had no business losing to…so strange.
- These users thanked the author FL350Aggie for the post:
- AV8AG
-
- Posts: 2402
- Joined: November 5th, 2010, 10:10 pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 779 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
There is no leash at all and currently the owner is letting him shi+ all over the grass.
Regulator of Class
-
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: March 12th, 2018, 6:51 pm
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 357 times
“Bonners on a short leash this week”
Agree with imakeitrain. Say that Bonner is the coaches favorite who has a very long leash but people in this thread are outright embarrassing themselves. Un (I can't express myself without swearing) real the personal jabs being taken in this thread and on this board. It’s a football game and ya we are terrible and the coach can’t seem to make it better but holy (I can't express myself without swearing).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author Usu0505 for the post (total 2):
- Imakeitrain • sam tingey
-
- Aggie Insider, Pick'em Champ - '18 Kickoff, '19 Weekly
- Posts: 19510
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:17 pm
- Location: Smithfield, Utah
- Has thanked: 23489 times
- Been thanked: 15814 times
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: March 12th, 2018, 6:51 pm
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 357 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
As well as the most pathetic and not because I disagree with the premise.aggies22 wrote:This is the longest running quote thread ever.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 3890
- Joined: November 19th, 2010, 11:30 pm
- Has thanked: 441 times
- Been thanked: 1176 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
You meant to add annoying as well but are too kind to do so.
-
- Posts: 9534
- Joined: September 12th, 2018, 2:01 pm
- Has thanked: 3054 times
- Been thanked: 4415 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
A couple of posts talking bad about Blake's and Bonner's religious beliefs are out of line. Aside from those a majority of the rest of the posts are just saying that Blake should have went to a different option based on how Bonner was playing. The vast majority of posters love what Bonner did last year as well as that the man is fearless and tough as nails. Those things aside it is time to give someone else a chance to lead this year's team at QB.Usu0505 wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 9:05 amAgree with imakeitrain. Say that Bonner is the coaches favorite who has a very long leash but people in this thread are outright embarrassing themselves. Un (I can't express myself without swearing) real the personal jabs being taken in this thread and on this board. It’s a football game and ya we are terrible and the coach can’t seem to make it better but holy (I can't express myself without swearing).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author Aggie84025 for the post:
- USU78
-
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: March 12th, 2018, 6:51 pm
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 357 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
There has been coward, clown and the assumption that Blake would go along with using his sons death and mental health as a gimmick to gain back fan support. Read other threads too because I said thread and board. Not everyone is saying these things but besides Imakeitrain I surely haven’t seen anyone call it out as below the line.Aggie84025 wrote:A couple of posts talking bad about Blake's and Bonner's religious beliefs are out of line. Aside from those a majority of the rest of the posts are just saying that Blake should have went to a different option based on how Bonner was playing. The vast majority of posters love what Bonner did last year as well as that the man is fearless and tough as nails. Those things aside it is time to give someone else a chance to lead this year's team at QB.Usu0505 wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 9:05 amAgree with imakeitrain. Say that Bonner is the coaches favorite who has a very long leash but people in this thread are outright embarrassing themselves. Un (I can't express myself without swearing) real the personal jabs being taken in this thread and on this board. It’s a football game and ya we are terrible and the coach can’t seem to make it better but holy (I can't express myself without swearing).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- 2004AG
- Posts: 12447
- Joined: November 16th, 2010, 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 804 times
- Been thanked: 1607 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
I don’t think anybody is saying Legas is great. I think they are saying we need to try somebody new.Imakeitrain wrote:People were complaining in chat that Bonner had a TD drive. People are complaining that Williams was given a chance. People are attacking Bonner because he dares to have a Christian symbol for his eye black. To even go to the point of calling Bonner a "surrogate son". Calling that reactionary is me putting it mildly.2004AG wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 12:35 amIt’s less “reactionary” and more “let’s try something new because what we are currently doing isn’t working”Imakeitrain wrote:My problem is with reactionary so called "fans".2004AG wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 12:07 amWhat’s your problem with Legas?Imakeitrain wrote:But when he has been in what have you seen? 50% completion percentages? Please.Hoot wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 11:39 pmWe haven’t even seen a full game of Coop lol. You did properly define what happens when people are not sarcastic so good on you I guess?Imakeitrain wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 10:48 pmYou pushed Bonner and now you’re pushing Legas.Hoot wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 10:43 pmBruhImakeitrain wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 10:37 pmIm making the same point I did then. You guys acted like Bonner was the 2nd coming of Jordan Love, your sarcasm even suggested you actually agreed Bonner was an NFL talent.Hoot wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 10:30 pmDo you just want someone to tell you you were right or something?Imakeitrain wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 10:27 pmThat’s my point because the sarcasm would suggest you chose Bonner over Peasley and outrightHoot wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 10:20 pmThat would be sarcasm.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 10:16 pmHoot wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 9:35 pmWhat about the two awful picks before that?Imakeitrain wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 9:32 pmNo it doesn’t and one of those picks was a Hail Mary. Cool hit the open wide receiver 30 yards short of the goal line. That’s what Bonner should have done.Hoot wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 9:20 pmSaying he’s on a short leash and leaving him in after four picks? Seems vaguely like a lie.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 9:12 pmBlake said that he owes Bonner this game.
He didn’t say he owes Bonner a series.
It’s very vague terminology to be calling him a “liar”
This you?
I one of the only people in that thread that was slightly skeptical of Bonner received reactions similar to this thread.
I’ve remained consistent. Never too high, never too low.
So maybe sit down when it comes to talking about of Legas is any good or not.
None of them are quality FBS QBs right now. If you weren’t being sarcastic you’d have been more accurate. (Not that Peasley is a heisman caliber player or that BA hates Peasley)
The fact is that we have a weak qb room. Going to Legas isn’t going to change anything and just like you pissed all over Peasley in favor of Bonner and are now doing to Bonner- you’ll be doing the same thing to Legas when he starts. Hell people are already doing that to Williams
Maybehe’s good, maybe he’s not. We have a very small sample size. What we do know is Bonner isn’t good this year.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If it were just "Bonner is struggling we should try something different" I'd agree. It looks like we are trying out Williams. Maybe we will try out Legas. But I really want people to spell out what specifically Legas has that makes him amazing given the sh!t some people were saying in chat and given the personal attacks on Bonner and Coach Anderson.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: March 12th, 2018, 6:51 pm
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 357 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
Oh yeah. Liar, someone I wouldn’t trust my kids with, I can go find more. aAnd again, this is not the collective whole but everyone is so mad about a football game that they are actually going along with this stuff, or at least ignoring how out of line it is.Usu0505 wrote:There has been coward, clown and the assumption that Blake would go along with using his sons death and mental health as a gimmick to gain back fan support. Read other threads too because I said thread and board. Not everyone is saying these things but besides Imakeitrain I surely haven’t seen anyone call it out as below the line.Aggie84025 wrote:A couple of posts talking bad about Blake's and Bonner's religious beliefs are out of line. Aside from those a majority of the rest of the posts are just saying that Blake should have went to a different option based on how Bonner was playing. The vast majority of posters love what Bonner did last year as well as that the man is fearless and tough as nails. Those things aside it is time to give someone else a chance to lead this year's team at QB.Usu0505 wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 9:05 amAgree with imakeitrain. Say that Bonner is the coaches favorite who has a very long leash but people in this thread are outright embarrassing themselves. Un (I can't express myself without swearing) real the personal jabs being taken in this thread and on this board. It’s a football game and ya we are terrible and the coach can’t seem to make it better but holy (I can't express myself without swearing).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author Usu0505 for the post:
- Imakeitrain
-
- Posts: 557
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:52 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 146 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
That’s surprising. Against Weber I was halfway through the canyon by the time the game was over. Last night I actually stayed because we were somewhat competitive, where against Weber we just plain got our A$$e$ handed to us.pcaggie wrote:First time in 25 years I turned off the game, I guess my Leash is shorter than Anderson’s
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 14095
- Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
- Has thanked: 928 times
- Been thanked: 1937 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
@Kraken I don’t need to disclaim a prediction as an opinion. A prediction is inherently an opinion.
You called what was inherently an opinion and called it a fact. Facts are objective.
If we’re to say “flamin hot is the best cheeto flavor” that is also an opinion. It’s also perfectly acceptable to state. It shows confidence in that opinion. The issue would be if someone said “fact: flamin hot is the best cheeto flavor”.
You called what was inherently an opinion and called it a fact. Facts are objective.
If we’re to say “flamin hot is the best cheeto flavor” that is also an opinion. It’s also perfectly acceptable to state. It shows confidence in that opinion. The issue would be if someone said “fact: flamin hot is the best cheeto flavor”.
-
- Posts: 2402
- Joined: November 5th, 2010, 10:10 pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 779 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
I guess you can triple stamp a double stamp. But seriously this team is leaderless on the field and on the sidelines. Players are lost. Team is lost. Fans are lost. Blake is lost.
Regulator of Class
-
- Posts: 14095
- Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
- Has thanked: 928 times
- Been thanked: 1937 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
@2004AG
That’s perfectly fine but this thread is based on “Blake is a liar because he said ‘short leash’ and he wasn’t pulled immediately when he struggled”
Another thread is based on going with Williams over Legas.
That’s perfectly fine but this thread is based on “Blake is a liar because he said ‘short leash’ and he wasn’t pulled immediately when he struggled”
Another thread is based on going with Williams over Legas.
- Hoot
- Posts: 4188
- Joined: August 16th, 2021, 4:59 pm
- Location: Your moms house.
- Has thanked: 1211 times
- Been thanked: 2416 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
I have deep feelings of personal shame for my participation.Madmartigan wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 9:17 amYou meant to add annoying as well but are too kind to do so.
“My hypocrisy goes only so far.”
- 2004AG
- Posts: 12447
- Joined: November 16th, 2010, 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 804 times
- Been thanked: 1607 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
Well, I don’t think it’s a stretch to claim a player that throws 4 interceptions DIDNT have a “short” leash.Imakeitrain wrote:[mention]2004AG[/mention]
That’s perfectly fine but this thread is based on “Blake is a liar because he said ‘short leash’ and he wasn’t pulled immediately when he struggled”
Another thread is based on going with Williams over Legas.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- USU78
- Pick'em Champ - '16 Weekly
- Posts: 15436
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 6:43 am
- Location: Sandy
- Has thanked: 7189 times
- Been thanked: 2089 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
"Fact: Bears eat beets.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 11:08 am@Kraken I don’t need to disclaim a prediction as an opinion. A prediction is inherently an opinion.
You called what was inherently an opinion and called it a fact. Facts are objective.
If we’re to say “flamin hot is the best cheeto flavor” that is also an opinion. It’s also perfectly acceptable to state. It shows confidence in that opinion. The issue would be if someone said “fact: flamin hot is the best cheeto flavor”.
...
Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica."
- These users thanked the author USU78 for the post:
- Imakeitrain
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
-
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: March 12th, 2018, 6:51 pm
- Has thanked: 196 times
- Been thanked: 357 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
A classic.USU78 wrote:"Fact: Bears eat beets.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 11:08 am@Kraken I don’t need to disclaim a prediction as an opinion. A prediction is inherently an opinion.
You called what was inherently an opinion and called it a fact. Facts are objective.
If we’re to say “flamin hot is the best cheeto flavor” that is also an opinion. It’s also perfectly acceptable to state. It shows confidence in that opinion. The issue would be if someone said “fact: flamin hot is the best cheeto flavor”.
...
Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica."
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 3890
- Joined: November 19th, 2010, 11:30 pm
- Has thanked: 441 times
- Been thanked: 1176 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
+ A fumble2004AG wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 11:46 amWell, I don’t think it’s a stretch to claim a player that throws 4 interceptions DIDNT have a “short” leash.Imakeitrain wrote:@2004AG
That’s perfectly fine but this thread is based on “Blake is a liar because he said ‘short leash’ and he wasn’t pulled immediately when he struggled”
Another thread is based on going with Williams over Legas.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- treesap32
- Moderator
- Posts: 16809
- Joined: July 28th, 2005, 1:00 am
- Location: Washington D.C.
- Has thanked: 1155 times
- Been thanked: 2702 times
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 14095
- Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
- Has thanked: 928 times
- Been thanked: 1937 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
The basis of the leash was Bonner’s confidence to run.2004AG wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 11:46 amWell, I don’t think it’s a stretch to claim a player that throws 4 interceptions DIDNT have a “short” leash.Imakeitrain wrote:@2004AG
That’s perfectly fine but this thread is based on “Blake is a liar because he said ‘short leash’ and he wasn’t pulled immediately when he struggled”
Another thread is based on going with Williams over Legas.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you want to claim Blake should have pulled Bonner sooner I would agree and I would have agreed 2 weeks ago. Even questioning if Blake’s short leash is too long is fair and I would agree to an extent.
But Blake said we’d move forward at “some point” and that he was going to give Bonner a chance to be the QB he believes Bonner is (and specifically as it relates to confidence.
Calling Blake a liar is a personal attack that ignores what Blake said.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: August 29th, 2022, 2:55 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 39 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
My problem With Bonner without mentioning his telegraphing his passes, is his tendency to throw to the right side of the field. I surmise that 80% of his throws went that way last night. Looking over the last 2 seasons, I think most of us can see that is true. He was an unknown quality last year and we had great receivers. This year teams have seen this tendency and have structured their defense to take advantage of this. To me that means we are only playing with half of a field and the defense only has to cover the same. Comments
-
- Posts: 525
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 1:24 pm
- Location: Kaysville UT
- Has thanked: 110 times
- Been thanked: 83 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
This is is leaning too much toward an analytical view of the situation. Right now its better if you stick to upset and angry emotional views of the situation….Old Fart Young @ Heart wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 12:40 pmMy problem With Bonner without mentioning his telegraphing his passes, is his tendency to throw to the right side of the field. I surmise that 80% of his throws went that way last night. Looking over the last 2 seasons, I think most of us can see that is true. He was an unknown quality last year and we had great receivers. This year teams have seen this tendency and have structured their defense to take advantage of this. To me that means we are only playing with half of a field and the defense only has to cover the same. Comments
- 2004AG
- Posts: 12447
- Joined: November 16th, 2010, 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 804 times
- Been thanked: 1607 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
You’re really arguing semantics.Imakeitrain wrote:The basis of the leash was Bonner’s confidence to run.2004AG wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 11:46 amWell, I don’t think it’s a stretch to claim a player that throws 4 interceptions DIDNT have a “short” leash.Imakeitrain wrote:@2004AG
That’s perfectly fine but this thread is based on “Blake is a liar because he said ‘short leash’ and he wasn’t pulled immediately when he struggled”
Another thread is based on going with Williams over Legas.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you want to claim Blake should have pulled Bonner sooner I would agree and I would have agreed 2 weeks ago. Even questioning if Blake’s short leash is too long is fair and I would agree to an extent.
But Blake said we’d move forward at “some point” and that he was going to give Bonner a chance to be the QB he believes Bonner is (and specifically as it relates to confidence.
Calling Blake a liar is a personal attack that ignores what Blake said.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 525
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 1:24 pm
- Location: Kaysville UT
- Has thanked: 110 times
- Been thanked: 83 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
Blake lead us to believe that if things weren’t going well, he would make a change. Pretty simple.
By my calculations, things weren’t going well. But I’m not paid ~$1M a year to do the calculations, I just pay a small fee to watch.
I agree with usu05 that all the personal insults are bad form on our part.
By my calculations, things weren’t going well. But I’m not paid ~$1M a year to do the calculations, I just pay a small fee to watch.
I agree with usu05 that all the personal insults are bad form on our part.
-
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: November 4th, 2010, 10:19 am
- Has thanked: 42 times
- Been thanked: 651 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
FloridaAggie13 wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 8:14 amThose only led to three points. The botched punt was a gimme seven points.Hoot wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 9:29 pmThe receivers suck but Bonner is the QB. We lost by ten and he had two brain dead picks. I’m not saying we’d have won but he threw us out of the game.aggiesdidwhat wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 9:25 pmStop putting all this on Bonner. Do you guys really truly think it will make a difference? Our receivers our..... Well not great. What do I know...Hoot wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 9:20 pmSaying he’s on a short leash and leaving him in after four picks? Seems vaguely like a lie.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 9:12 pmBlake said that he owes Bonner this game.
He didn’t say he owes Bonner a series.
It’s very vague terminology to be calling him a “liar”
The INT to Cobbs down the sideline is the perfect illustration of our WR's inability to get open. Cobbs barely got even with the CB.
It's hard to tell on TV if the receivers have any separation. Bonner floats all his throws so even if there was room, they can always recover. Notice last year our receivers always had to get jump balls, they weren't getting the ball because they had separation most of the time. Bonner has no zip and even worse this year. His 2 early picks weren't close to anyone.
-
- Posts: 23379
- Joined: August 22nd, 2011, 2:18 pm
- Has thanked: 7769 times
- Been thanked: 2813 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
His first pick was the worst; obviously forced into double coverage, shouldn't have been thrown. The second INT it appeared the linebacker read the play at the snap. Easy to say it shouldn't be thrown but it was probably an automatic three step drop, throw the slant based on the defense.TrueAG wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 1:31 pmFloridaAggie13 wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 8:14 amThose only led to three points. The botched punt was a gimme seven points.Hoot wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 9:29 pmThe receivers suck but Bonner is the QB. We lost by ten and he had two brain dead picks. I’m not saying we’d have won but he threw us out of the game.aggiesdidwhat wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 9:25 pmStop putting all this on Bonner. Do you guys really truly think it will make a difference? Our receivers our..... Well not great. What do I know...Hoot wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 9:20 pmSaying he’s on a short leash and leaving him in after four picks? Seems vaguely like a lie.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑September 24th, 2022, 9:12 pmBlake said that he owes Bonner this game.
He didn’t say he owes Bonner a series.
It’s very vague terminology to be calling him a “liar”
The INT to Cobbs down the sideline is the perfect illustration of our WR's inability to get open. Cobbs barely got even with the CB.
It's hard to tell on TV if the receivers have any separation. Bonner floats all his throws so even if there was room, they can always recover. Notice last year our receivers always had to get jump balls, they weren't getting the ball because they had separation most of the time. Bonner has no zip and even worse this year. His 2 early picks weren't close to anyone.
Cobb wasn't open on the deep pass but it was man coverage so it is understandable to throw it and expecting the WR to beat the DB. The other two INT's were just desperation throws as time ran out at the end of the half and the game.
Play Legas, may as well. I don't think the passing game will improve much until the WR's improve. Not sure how that happens though. Lega's legs will probably get us one or two more first downs every game.
- These users thanked the author FloridaAggie13 for the post:
- Imakeitrain
- dyedblue
- Posts: 8442
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 852 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
Can someone explain to me why we would ever call a designed QB run on 3rd and 4?
“The winning team has a dedication. It will have a core of veteran players who set the standards. They will not accept defeat.” --Merlin Olsen
-
- Posts: 23379
- Joined: August 22nd, 2011, 2:18 pm
- Has thanked: 7769 times
- Been thanked: 2813 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
QB draw against an over-aggressive DL with its ears pinned back, completely oblivious to the possibility of the QB running.
- Hoot
- Posts: 4188
- Joined: August 16th, 2021, 4:59 pm
- Location: Your moms house.
- Has thanked: 1211 times
- Been thanked: 2416 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
For the same reason we called play action on 4th and 19 against Weber.
- These users thanked the author Hoot for the post:
- FloridaAggie13
“My hypocrisy goes only so far.”
-
- Posts: 14095
- Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
- Has thanked: 928 times
- Been thanked: 1937 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
Think what you will.2004AG wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 1:04 pmYou’re really arguing semantics.Imakeitrain wrote:The basis of the leash was Bonner’s confidence to run.2004AG wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 11:46 amWell, I don’t think it’s a stretch to claim a player that throws 4 interceptions DIDNT have a “short” leash.Imakeitrain wrote:@2004AG
That’s perfectly fine but this thread is based on “Blake is a liar because he said ‘short leash’ and he wasn’t pulled immediately when he struggled”
Another thread is based on going with Williams over Legas.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you want to claim Blake should have pulled Bonner sooner I would agree and I would have agreed 2 weeks ago. Even questioning if Blake’s short leash is too long is fair and I would agree to an extent.
But Blake said we’d move forward at “some point” and that he was going to give Bonner a chance to be the QB he believes Bonner is (and specifically as it relates to confidence.
Calling Blake a liar is a personal attack that ignores what Blake said.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When you call someone a liar I think it’s fair to see what was actually said.
-
- Posts: 901
- Joined: September 17th, 2019, 10:04 pm
- Has thanked: 272 times
- Been thanked: 483 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
Yeah, if you play like crap and keep losing games you get benched. It happens in competitive sports.FL350Aggie wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 8:48 amIn other news Miami just benched their starting QB because he lost to somebody Miami had no business losing to…so strange.
- CaptainChaos
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:58 am
- Has thanked: 57 times
- Been thanked: 381 times
“Bonners on a short leash this week”
Could be a decent play if your qb had any business running. Unfortunately our qb has no business running at all, but he’s in an offense that has the qb running aspect as a necessity not a luxury.dyedblue wrote:Can someone explain to me why we would ever call a designed QB run on 3rd and 4?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author CaptainChaos for the post:
- AggiePT
- AndroidAggie
- Posts: 4414
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 7:47 am
- Location: fairfax, va
- Has thanked: 203 times
- Been thanked: 350 times
Re: “Bonners on a short leash this week”
probably more accurate to say the coach is being disingenuous than calling him a liar. 'liar' is a pretty strong label. i don't think he lied.