Proposed 3-point line change

This forum is for Basketball discussion only. Other topics will be moved to the appropriate forum.
bluegrouse
Posts: 2673
Joined: November 9th, 2010, 5:04 pm
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 161 times

Proposed 3-point line change

Post by bluegrouse » May 10th, 2019, 2:27 pm

Looks like the 3-point line may be moved back about 1’-5” for the 2019-20 season...

https://www.ncaa.com/news/basketball-me ... point-line

Also, shot clock only reset to 20 seconds following a missed shot that hits the rim instead of the full 30.
These users liked this post from bluegrouse:
ProvoAggie



User avatar
treesap32
Moderator
Posts: 14296
Joined: July 28th, 2005, 1:00 am
Location: Washington D.C.
Has liked: 52 times
Been liked: 83 times
Contact:

Re: Proposed 3-point line change

Post by treesap32 » May 10th, 2019, 2:45 pm

I like the suggested change.



User avatar
BigBlueDart
2017 FB Predict The Score Champion
Posts: 7593
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 7:57 am
Location: Syracuse, UT
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 38 times

Re: Proposed 3-point line change

Post by BigBlueDart » May 10th, 2019, 5:10 pm

I approve.



User avatar
hipsterdoofus21
Posts: 14810
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 9:39 pm
Has liked: 74 times
Been liked: 202 times

Re: Proposed 3-point line change

Post by hipsterdoofus21 » May 10th, 2019, 5:44 pm

I like these changes. I wish they’d retract the “freedom of movement” rule. Also go to 4 quarters and cut out a media timeout and a timeout for each team to improve the game flow. Lastly, go to 6 fouls before getting DQ’d. You shouldn’t have star players sitting out of games the moment they get 2 fouls in the first half.



Jjoey53
Posts: 1183
Joined: January 9th, 2018, 4:28 pm
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 36 times

Re: Proposed 3-point line change

Post by Jjoey53 » May 10th, 2019, 7:09 pm

Leave it alone and quit trying to make it NBA.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk



918AGG
Posts: 467
Joined: December 20th, 2012, 6:49 pm
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Has liked: 44 times
Been liked: 46 times

Re: Proposed 3-point line change

Post by 918AGG » May 13th, 2019, 12:23 pm

Jjoey53 wrote:
May 10th, 2019, 7:09 pm
Leave it alone and quit trying to make it NBA.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
College basketball obviously needs to move its 3-point line back, and the NBA also needs to move its 3-point line back a bit... ESPN had a really interesting article on this a few weeks ago with a few ideas for the NBA:
1) Bring the 3-point line back far enough (and keep the line a consistent distance from the basket) to completely eliminate the corner three. I like this one.
2) Let each team choose where their 3-point line will be and how it will look... sort of like in baseball how each team has their own field and tries to stack their lineup in the best way to utilize players who can take advantage of a shallow right field or whatever. Pushing it back super far might be a good strategy for Golden State, Portland, etc., while a team like the Jazz might bring it in a bit. This is an interesting idea, but I prefer #1 above.


"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt."

- Bertrand Russell

User avatar
thegreendalegelf
Posts: 394
Joined: August 18th, 2017, 3:26 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Proposed 3-point line change

Post by thegreendalegelf » May 13th, 2019, 2:07 pm

918AGG wrote:
May 13th, 2019, 12:23 pm
Jjoey53 wrote:
May 10th, 2019, 7:09 pm
Leave it alone and quit trying to make it NBA.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
College basketball obviously needs to move its 3-point line back, and the NBA also needs to move its 3-point line back a bit... ESPN had a really interesting article on this a few weeks ago with a few ideas for the NBA:
1) Bring the 3-point line back far enough (and keep the line a consistent distance from the basket) to completely eliminate the corner three. I like this one.
2) Let each team choose where their 3-point line will be and how it will look... sort of like in baseball how each team has their own field and tries to stack their lineup in the best way to utilize players who can take advantage of a shallow right field or whatever. Pushing it back super far might be a good strategy for Golden State, Portland, etc., while a team like the Jazz might bring it in a bit. This is an interesting idea, but I prefer #1 above.
I have mixed feeling about #2. I think it makes home court advantage more valuable. It would also make advanced analytics very different so that it can account for the shot distance instead of if its a 2 or 3.



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic