Football Home Game
Sat, August 31, 2024
Sat, August 31, 2024
Basketball Home Game
Fri, November 1, 2024
Fri, November 1, 2024
USU up to 73 in NET Rankings
-
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: January 26th, 2019, 6:27 pm
- Has thanked: 495 times
- Been thanked: 919 times
Re: USU up to 73 in NET Rankings
Has to be, but it's hard to figure when you look at their sheet. Their only Q1 game was a 17 pt loss to LSU, and their only Q2 game was a 13 pt win vs Akron (#83). Outside that, their only wins vs teams in the top 200 are vs. #79 Radford, #165 Vandy, and #151 Towson.Real Life Aggie wrote: ↑January 31st, 2020, 11:34 amOther teams that they beat perhaps doing well? Other teams to whom they lost also doing well?
I might be missing something, but I don't see any of their opponents have played last night vs. any team that is ranked in the top half. Just seems odd a jump of 9 in one day just by beating Kennesaw.
Any Aggie NET experts on here that can shed some light?
-
- Aggie Insider, Pick'em Champ - '18 Kickoff, '19 Weekly
- Posts: 19452
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:17 pm
- Location: Smithfield, Utah
- Has thanked: 23426 times
- Been thanked: 15620 times
- Contact:
Re: USU up to 73 in NET Rankings
Great question my Aggie brother!Bank Shot wrote: ↑January 31st, 2020, 11:49 amHas to be, but it's hard to figure when you look at their sheet. Their only Q1 game was a 17 pt loss to LSU, and their only Q2 game was a 13 pt win vs Akron (#83). Outside that, their only wins vs teams in the top 200 are vs. #79 Radford, #165 Vandy, and #151 Towson.Real Life Aggie wrote: ↑January 31st, 2020, 11:34 amOther teams that they beat perhaps doing well? Other teams to whom they lost also doing well?
I might be missing something, but I don't see any of their opponents have played last night vs. any team that is ranked in the top half. Just seems odd a jump of 9 in one day just by beating Kennesaw.
Any Aggie NET experts on here that can shed some light?
- SweepDance
- Posts: 539
- Joined: February 7th, 2011, 12:18 pm
- Location: Sandy, UT
- Has thanked: 211 times
- Been thanked: 236 times
Re: USU up to 73 in NET Rankings
I wouldn't call myself an expert, but it seems to me that the NET way overreacts to large margins of victory.Bank Shot wrote: ↑January 31st, 2020, 11:49 amHas to be, but it's hard to figure when you look at their sheet. Their only Q1 game was a 17 pt loss to LSU, and their only Q2 game was a 13 pt win vs Akron (#83). Outside that, their only wins vs teams in the top 200 are vs. #79 Radford, #165 Vandy, and #151 Towson.Real Life Aggie wrote: ↑January 31st, 2020, 11:34 amOther teams that they beat perhaps doing well? Other teams to whom they lost also doing well?
I might be missing something, but I don't see any of their opponents have played last night vs. any team that is ranked in the top half. Just seems odd a jump of 9 in one day just by beating Kennesaw.
Any Aggie NET experts on here that can shed some light?
- treesap32
- Moderator
- Posts: 16804
- Joined: July 28th, 2005, 1:00 am
- Location: Washington D.C.
- Has thanked: 1145 times
- Been thanked: 2692 times
- Contact:
Re: USU up to 73 in NET Rankings
The NET does weigh in margin of victory, but it caps it at 10 points. So if you win by 30 or win by 10, it counts the same.SweepDance wrote: ↑January 31st, 2020, 12:15 pmI wouldn't call myself an expert, but it seems to me that the NET way overreacts to large margins of victory.Bank Shot wrote: ↑January 31st, 2020, 11:49 amHas to be, but it's hard to figure when you look at their sheet. Their only Q1 game was a 17 pt loss to LSU, and their only Q2 game was a 13 pt win vs Akron (#83). Outside that, their only wins vs teams in the top 200 are vs. #79 Radford, #165 Vandy, and #151 Towson.Real Life Aggie wrote: ↑January 31st, 2020, 11:34 amOther teams that they beat perhaps doing well? Other teams to whom they lost also doing well?
I might be missing something, but I don't see any of their opponents have played last night vs. any team that is ranked in the top half. Just seems odd a jump of 9 in one day just by beating Kennesaw.
Any Aggie NET experts on here that can shed some light?
- brownjeans
- Flatulent
- Posts: 18612
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:21 am
- Has thanked: 951 times
- Been thanked: 1739 times
Re: USU up to 73 in NET Rankings
Unfortunately, the activity in this thread has all but guaranteed we'll lose tomorrow.
It will have nothing to do with SDSU - just this thread's nonsense.
It will have nothing to do with SDSU - just this thread's nonsense.
- These users thanked the author brownjeans for the post:
- ineptimusprime
-
- Posts: 901
- Joined: September 17th, 2019, 10:04 pm
- Has thanked: 272 times
- Been thanked: 483 times
At-large hope?
I know a win on Saturday is extremely unlikely. But if we were able to pull off a miracle and win, do you think that immediately puts us back in position for an at-large?
Obviously a ton of work to do before we can even think about that, just wondering what people’s thoughts were.
Obviously a ton of work to do before we can even think about that, just wondering what people’s thoughts were.
- Roy McAvoy
- Posts: 7559
- Joined: November 2nd, 2011, 1:30 pm
- Has thanked: 1196 times
- Been thanked: 2980 times
Re: At-large hope?
There's a decent discussion going about this exact thing in the thread right below this one, the "Up to 73 in the Net Rankings" thread. I agree with Dogie's post in it, except I think USU has to win out (besides 2 losses to SDSU) and then would be in the tourney.
dogie wrote: ↑January 31st, 2020, 11:08 amIf they can best SDSU tomorrow (in my view, wildly improbable), they will be pencilled in as an 8 seed, and they’ll be in the field unless they play themselves out of it will multiple bad losses.
A win at SDSU tomorrow would be one of the five highest-quality wins in the entire county through this point in the season.
Even with a loss tomorrow, the Aggies will be in the conversation. The NET ranking might even improve with a loss. If the Aggies drop the SDSU game and one other, and then lose in the MWC championship game to SDSU, I think they are barely in. Anything short of that will leave them out.
- treesap32
- Moderator
- Posts: 16804
- Joined: July 28th, 2005, 1:00 am
- Location: Washington D.C.
- Has thanked: 1145 times
- Been thanked: 2692 times
- Contact:
Re: USU up to 73 in NET Rankings
I think with a win we jump into the low 40's, maybe even high thirties which should put us definitely in contention. We would have two great wins and one very good Quad 1 wins at that point. We need Florida to stay in the top 50. If we lose to SDSU it will be tough, but probably not impossible.
-
- SJSU Ultimate Loser Award Winner - Given to someone that should probably give up but won't.
- Posts: 23472
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:09 am
- Location: Where the sagebrush grows!
- Has thanked: 1417 times
- Been thanked: 3233 times
Re: USU up to 73 in NET Rankings
This is exactly what I think. Losing to SDSU won’t help, but there is a path to the NCAA tournament even if the Aggies lose to SDSU three times this year.
I have been happy to see that the Aztecs are able to maintain a #1 position even while playing a MWC schedule.
Re: USU up to 73 in NET Rankings
The loss to SDSU dropped the Aggies from 54 to 57. That’s exactly where they were four days ago after beating Wyoming.
There is plenty of work to do, but they are in a position where they can play themselves into the tournament over the next four weeks.
There is plenty of work to do, but they are in a position where they can play themselves into the tournament over the next four weeks.
Re: USU up to 73 in NET Rankings
And they are back up to 55 after a very light Super Bowl Sunday national schedule today.
I find it interesting that the Aggies’ NET ranking does practically nothing but improve on days they don’t play.
I find it interesting that the Aggies’ NET ranking does practically nothing but improve on days they don’t play.
Re: USU up to 73 in NET Rankings
How many teams ranked from 50-60 in the NET last year made it to the tournament?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"We are not here to weather the storm, We are here to be the storm!"
-Jason Kreis
-Jason Kreis
- QuackAttackAggie
- Pick'em Champ - '12, '22 Bowl; '15, '17 Weekly; '18 BB Predict the Score; '22 Kickoff
- Posts: 18232
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:08 pm
- Location: Sonora, MX
- Has thanked: 310 times
- Been thanked: 2958 times
Re: USU up to 73 in NET Rankings
Oregon (51) autobid, 12 seed
Ohio State (55) at large, 11 seed
Temple (56) at large, 11 seed, play in
Seton hall (57) at large, 10 seed
Liberty (58) auto bid, 12 seed
Arizona State (63), at large, 11 seed, play in
St John's (72) at large, 11 seed, play in
- These users thanked the author QuackAttackAggie for the post:
- sneed
- QuackAttackAggie
- Pick'em Champ - '12, '22 Bowl; '15, '17 Weekly; '18 BB Predict the Score; '22 Kickoff
- Posts: 18232
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:08 pm
- Location: Sonora, MX
- Has thanked: 310 times
- Been thanked: 2958 times
Re: USU up to 73 in NET Rankings
This site will show you how games between other teams today will affect RPI ranking, which you can use to extrapolate for net somewhat
http://warrennolan.com/basketball/2020/ ... Utah-State
http://warrennolan.com/basketball/2020/ ... Utah-State
-
- Posts: 2721
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:22 am
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: USU up to 73 in NET Rankings
We, dogie, WE can play OURSELVES into the tournament.... I'm concerned that your fandom is becoming too objective.
- These users thanked the author Rabidchild for the post (total 3):
- USU78 • hipsterdoofus21 • treesap32
I'm a reasonable man, get off my case.
Re: USU up to 73 in NET Rankings
Right on! That’s why I watch the games!Rabidchild wrote: ↑February 3rd, 2020, 9:51 pmWe, dogie, WE can play OURSELVES into the tournament.... I'm concerned that your fandom is becoming too objective.