Football Home Game
Sat, August 30, 2025
Sat, August 30, 2025
Basketball Away Game (CBSSN)
Sun, February 16, 2025 @ 2:00 pm
Sun, February 16, 2025 @ 2:00 pm
Match-up Zone
-
- Posts: 2265
- Joined: November 6th, 2010, 9:04 pm
- Has thanked: 162 times
- Been thanked: 1176 times
Match-up Zone
It could be that I just haven't heard the reference in previous seasons due to lack of familiarity, but...
Last night I spent some time watching the Providence College game. It was pretty clear that, much of the game, their opponent was in a straight-up zone defense. Based on my basketball experience it was obvious that - especially the perimeter players - the defenders were more interested in their spot on the floor than in following an offensive player. Though occasionally they did shift toa M-M defense, the bulk of their time was in a zone defense.
But at one point (in the second half??), the announcers stated that they were playing a match-up zone. Due to my new exposure to the defense, I was intrigued to see how it was implemented. I could tell that that was probably what they were trying. But they only did it for a couple of possessions. Exploitation by the offense has a tendency to pull you out of a defense.
So I got to wondering. Did the opposition's new coach arrive in Provo with a match-up zone strategy (and not implement it very well on that night)? Or is imitation the sincerest form of flattery? There is a team close enough in proximity that plays almost exclusively match-up zone. Wonder if it was noticed in Provo.
Interestingly, while watching the UW-UCLA, the same thing happened. The announcers stated that UW was now in a match-up zone. But it didn't last long either. I get the impression that there is more to it than just calling out "Run a match-up zone".
Last night I spent some time watching the Providence College game. It was pretty clear that, much of the game, their opponent was in a straight-up zone defense. Based on my basketball experience it was obvious that - especially the perimeter players - the defenders were more interested in their spot on the floor than in following an offensive player. Though occasionally they did shift toa M-M defense, the bulk of their time was in a zone defense.
But at one point (in the second half??), the announcers stated that they were playing a match-up zone. Due to my new exposure to the defense, I was intrigued to see how it was implemented. I could tell that that was probably what they were trying. But they only did it for a couple of possessions. Exploitation by the offense has a tendency to pull you out of a defense.
So I got to wondering. Did the opposition's new coach arrive in Provo with a match-up zone strategy (and not implement it very well on that night)? Or is imitation the sincerest form of flattery? There is a team close enough in proximity that plays almost exclusively match-up zone. Wonder if it was noticed in Provo.
Interestingly, while watching the UW-UCLA, the same thing happened. The announcers stated that UW was now in a match-up zone. But it didn't last long either. I get the impression that there is more to it than just calling out "Run a match-up zone".