Aggies 21.5 Favorite

usu99 · Post by **usu99** » January 20th, 2011, 8:26 am

Do we cover?

Mr. Sneelock · Post by **Mr. Sneelock** » January 20th, 2011, 8:35 am

That is a big number, but I say yes. Aggies 77, Techsters 54.

Post by **treesap32** » January 20th, 2011, 9:55 am

Under

Donman · Post by **Donman** » January 20th, 2011, 9:59 am

Let me get this straight, some have suggested that we bring in Kerry Rupp or an assistant to replace Stew?

Anyone note the irony?

pilotaggie · Post by **pilotaggie** » January 20th, 2011, 10:37 am

I think if we come close to covering the spread it will be with a couple minutes left. At that point Stew will probably put the bench guys in to give them some time and we'll end up winning by about 15.

GUS · Post by **GUS** » January 20th, 2011, 11:18 am

I am not thinking that Kerry Rupp is a replacement for Stew at this point but he has an assistant who is a USU graduate who I wouldn't mind Stew bringing in as an assistant if he has an opening. The assistant is a loyal Aggie who wants to be at USU he would also add an LDS element to the coaching staff. Having someone who is strong LDS on the staff may help with the instate recruiting. Two years ago I sat by Kerry Rupp at the tournament in Reno. I enjoyed my visit with him and found him to be a good individual. I am surprised at his lack of success this year. Didn't he lose an NBA draft pick off of last years team?

wacfan08 · Post by **wacfan08** » January 20th, 2011, 11:43 am

treesap32 wrote:Under

what is the over/under or are you saying we don't cover?

usu99 · Post by **usu99** » January 20th, 2011, 11:54 am

126 is the over/under

wacfan08 · Post by **wacfan08** » January 20th, 2011, 11:57 am

usu99 wrote:126 is the over/under

I think we cover and I wold take the over.. I am think something like 78 - 55

Post by **treesap32** » January 20th, 2011, 2:30 pm

wacfan08 wrote:
treesap32 wrote:Under
what is the over/under or are you saying we don't cover?

I was trying to say that we don't cover. The terminology may have been wrong.

GameFAQSAggie · Post by **GameFAQSAggie** » January 20th, 2011, 2:33 pm

treesap32 wrote:
wacfan08 wrote:
treesap32 wrote:Under
what is the over/under or are you saying we don't cover?
I was trying to say that we don't cover. The terminology may have been wrong.

Yeah, the proper way would be to say "We don't cover". "Under" in gambling terms means that you think two teams in a given game will combine for less points than the line they are setting.

Post by **treesap32** » January 20th, 2011, 2:49 pm

GameFAQSAggie wrote:
treesap32 wrote: I was trying to say that we don't cover. The terminology may have been wrong.
Yeah, the proper way would be to say "We don't cover". "Under" in gambling terms means that you think two teams in a given game will combine for less points than the line they are setting.

Thanks GFA. I am once again learning from the master.

Quelch · Post by **Quelch** » January 20th, 2011, 11:01 pm

Aggies have a very hard time covering these huge numbers. When the spread is slight, they usually make it. Watch out for the big numbers. They usually don't happen. Not Stews style.

Upcoming Events

Event Results