1:54 left, no timeouts, Sanford calls a run

This forum is for Football related topics only. Other topics will be moved to the appropriate forum.
User avatar
hipsterdoofus21
Mr. Buttface
Posts: 17983
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 9:39 pm
Has thanked: 2992 times
Been thanked: 3019 times

1:54 left, no timeouts, Sanford calls a run

Post by hipsterdoofus21 » December 20th, 2019, 10:20 pm

Then 2 plays later with our season hanging in the balance and our offense facing 4th and 18 we throw to a TE running slowly 6 yards down the field across the middle. That was the best we could come up with.

I'm sorry, I just don't think this guy is the answer. It's one thing to deal with injuries and to try and adopt a new system to cater to returning players from a record setting offense, and it's another to make boneheaded play calls all year long and scuttle your own ship.

I would not be sad to see Sanford go.



Aggie84025
Posts: 9274
Joined: September 12th, 2018, 2:01 pm
Has thanked: 2685 times
Been thanked: 4247 times

Re: 1:54 left, no timeouts, Sanford calls a run

Post by Aggie84025 » December 20th, 2019, 10:31 pm

I thought Sanford called a good game. Not his fault warren dropped that pass, nathan making a mistake on the punt, bright fumbling it, bad snap on the punt and whatever the call was on the kickoff. Offense put up 41 points which should get a victory most nights.
These users thanked the author Aggie84025 for the post:
sneed



ineptimusprime
Posts: 7630
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:07 pm
Has thanked: 393 times
Been thanked: 4596 times

Re: 1:54 left, no timeouts, Sanford calls a run

Post by ineptimusprime » December 20th, 2019, 10:31 pm

This loss was 0% on Sanford.
These users thanked the author ineptimusprime for the post (total 2):
BLUERUFiOaggies22



User avatar
dyedblue
Posts: 8410
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 4:21 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 828 times

Re: 1:54 left, no timeouts, Sanford calls a run

Post by dyedblue » December 20th, 2019, 10:38 pm

I’ve been critical of Sanford, but this on isn’t in him at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


“The winning team has a dedication. It will have a core of veteran players who set the standards. They will not accept defeat.” --Merlin Olsen

Elkaggie
Posts: 5586
Joined: August 26th, 2011, 5:21 pm
Has thanked: 195 times
Been thanked: 1134 times

Re: 1:54 left, no timeouts, Sanford calls a run

Post by Elkaggie » December 20th, 2019, 10:39 pm

Agree. We ran 2 plays under center. Also the jet sweep to DT was a great call.

D got mowed over.



User avatar
Aglicious
Site Admin
Posts: 7106
Joined: January 14th, 2004, 12:00 am
Location: Vega$
Has thanked: 910 times
Been thanked: 2366 times

Re: 1:54 left, no timeouts, Sanford calls a run

Post by Aglicious » December 20th, 2019, 10:52 pm

I am still not happy with situational play calling from Sanford but when you gain 29 first downs, put up 505 total yards, and 41 points you should win....especially against a team the caliber of Kent St.
These users thanked the author Aglicious for the post:
aggies22



coolag
Posts: 2393
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 10:10 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 757 times

Re: 1:54 left, no timeouts, Sanford calls a run

Post by coolag » December 20th, 2019, 11:06 pm

Aglicious wrote:
December 20th, 2019, 10:52 pm
I am still not happy with situational play calling from Sanford but when you gain 29 first downs, put up 505 total yards, and 41 points you should win....especially against a team the caliber of Kent St.
Nope you need Clemson money, talent, and coaching to achieve such a result. To think otherwise is laughable.


Regulator of Class

User avatar
WAAggie
Posts: 3398
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:02 am
Location: Kent WA
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 516 times

Re: 1:54 left, no timeouts, Sanford calls a run

Post by WAAggie » December 20th, 2019, 11:14 pm

Run plays and underneath pass we’re stupid, but defense sucked. All of us watching knew their qb was most likely to go for the TD, yet we did not even focus on him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



User avatar
brownjeans
Flatulent
Posts: 18612
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:21 am
Has thanked: 951 times
Been thanked: 1739 times

Re: 1:54 left, no timeouts, Sanford calls a run

Post by brownjeans » December 21st, 2019, 7:39 am

Offense didn't lose this game



User avatar
Empire of Dirt
Posts: 3347
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 6:57 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 45 times

Re: 1:54 left, no timeouts, Sanford calls a run

Post by Empire of Dirt » December 21st, 2019, 8:11 am

brownjeans wrote:Offense didn't lose this game
They didn't win it either, but I don't think that is what he was saying.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk



"If you are not an Aggie Fan you are a complete loser." -Kyle Gunther

User avatar
2004AG
Posts: 12381
Joined: November 16th, 2010, 11:42 am
Has thanked: 762 times
Been thanked: 1583 times

Re: 1:54 left, no timeouts, Sanford calls a run

Post by 2004AG » December 21st, 2019, 9:42 am

Ya wrong person to blame. Offense looked great.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



User avatar
brownjeans
Flatulent
Posts: 18612
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:21 am
Has thanked: 951 times
Been thanked: 1739 times

Re: 1:54 left, no timeouts, Sanford calls a run

Post by brownjeans » December 21st, 2019, 12:40 pm

Empire of Dirt wrote:
December 21st, 2019, 8:11 am
brownjeans wrote:Offense didn't lose this game
They didn't win it either, but I don't think that is what he was saying.
Nope, but criticizing the offense in a game where the margin for error was zero because the defense played so poorly isn't very fair. I mean, do we expect perfection? That's how good the offense would have needed to be to overcome how bad the defense was.



User avatar
BearLakeMonster
Posts: 2391
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:45 am
Location: The Caribbean of the Rockies
Has thanked: 375 times
Been thanked: 388 times

Re: 1:54 left, no timeouts, Sanford calls a run

Post by BearLakeMonster » December 21st, 2019, 5:20 pm

coolag wrote:
December 20th, 2019, 11:06 pm
Aglicious wrote:
December 20th, 2019, 10:52 pm
I am still not happy with situational play calling from Sanford but when you gain 29 first downs, put up 505 total yards, and 41 points you should win....especially against a team the caliber of Kent St.
Nope you need Clemson money, talent, and coaching to achieve such a result. To think otherwise is laughable.
Not Clemson, ya dingus. Alabama. Sheesh.


"The evil I can tolerate. But the stupidity... Just knowing we're in the same genus makes me embarrassed to call myself homo!"

coolag
Posts: 2393
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 10:10 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 757 times

Re: 1:54 left, no timeouts, Sanford calls a run

Post by coolag » December 21st, 2019, 6:01 pm

BearLakeMonster wrote:
December 21st, 2019, 5:20 pm
coolag wrote:
December 20th, 2019, 11:06 pm
Aglicious wrote:
December 20th, 2019, 10:52 pm
I am still not happy with situational play calling from Sanford but when you gain 29 first downs, put up 505 total yards, and 41 points you should win....especially against a team the caliber of Kent St.
Nope you need Clemson money, talent, and coaching to achieve such a result. To think otherwise is laughable.
Not Clemson, ya dingus. Alabama. Sheesh.
Clemson, Alabama, Kent State. Their all the same. My mistake.


Regulator of Class

Locked Previous topicNext topic