Football Home Game
Sat, August 31, 2024
Sat, August 31, 2024
Basketball Home Game
Fri, November 1, 2024
Fri, November 1, 2024
Proposed Group of 5 Playoff
-
- Posts: 402
- Joined: November 4th, 2010, 10:37 am
- Has thanked: 208 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
Proposed Group of 5 Playoff
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/ ... r-AA1nxgQr
I have come around to the idea of a playoff..
I have come around to the idea of a playoff..
- These users thanked the author NavyBlue for the post (total 2):
- AggieUprising50 • flying_scotsman2.0
-
- Posts: 996
- Joined: January 31st, 2015, 4:31 pm
- Has thanked: 151 times
- Been thanked: 419 times
Re: Proposed Group of 5 Playoff
I'd be all for a Group of 5 playoff.
I've also seen a proposed super league with a "G5 relegated" division (see picture for reference). My dream would be to have a G5 playoffs, then have the top 2-4 teams from said playoffs move up to the Super/Premier League, while having the bottom 2-4 premier league divisions down to G5.
I've also seen a proposed super league with a "G5 relegated" division (see picture for reference). My dream would be to have a G5 playoffs, then have the top 2-4 teams from said playoffs move up to the Super/Premier League, while having the bottom 2-4 premier league divisions down to G5.
- These users thanked the author AggieUprising50 for the post (total 3):
- 3rdGenAggie • flying_scotsman2.0 • AggieBlues
Re: Proposed Group of 5 Playoff
This would be the nail in the coffin for me. Not trying to spind like a fair weather fan...but being in a league like this would feel like a true step down to FCS level... I know our current situation is not the most glamorous, but at least in a crazy year, we can be ranked in the same rankings as the other bigger programs
-
- Posts: 13292
- Joined: November 3rd, 2016, 8:47 pm
- Has thanked: 1367 times
- Been thanked: 2465 times
Re: Proposed Group of 5 Playoff
Wyoming, San Jose State, Hawaii, and Air Force should go there.
For the rest of the MWC plus Oregon State and Washington State belong in the P5 world.
The future hinges on finding the right media deal in the near future.
For the rest of the MWC plus Oregon State and Washington State belong in the P5 world.
The future hinges on finding the right media deal in the near future.
- flying_scotsman2.0
- Posts: 3586
- Joined: January 23rd, 2018, 12:29 pm
- Location: The Mighty City-State of Roy, Utah
- Has thanked: 6051 times
- Been thanked: 2285 times
Re: Proposed Group of 5 Playoff
Sounds like the G5 is getting shafted financially. I think the P5 (4, 2, whatever it is) might start sweating when they lose their whipping boy. If the G5 can make more money on their own, I say do it. I’m cheering for USU wherever they end up.
- These users thanked the author flying_scotsman2.0 for the post (total 3):
- trevordude • LarryTheAggie • JSHarvey
-
- Posts: 2283
- Joined: December 10th, 2010, 1:32 pm
- Has thanked: 814 times
- Been thanked: 828 times
Re: Proposed Group of 5 Playoff
Yup. The worst thing for the P-4 would be if we quit playing them and they only had each other to beat up on.
One of them being the loser in every game would be a nightmare for them
That is leverage that the G-5/? Could use if we would stick together. Of course, there will always be a few who hope to join them in the future and would not be willing to offend them.
One of them being the loser in every game would be a nightmare for them
That is leverage that the G-5/? Could use if we would stick together. Of course, there will always be a few who hope to join them in the future and would not be willing to offend them.
-
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: November 27th, 2013, 10:16 am
- Has thanked: 372 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
Re: Proposed Group of 5 Playoff
Every decision being made about the future of the college sports is being driven by the rich who will simply get richer. The amount of money being unleashed on college sports will further the divide. That is not going to change and is not good news for USU.
Re: Proposed Group of 5 Playoff
cval wrote: ↑April 26th, 2024, 5:40 pmYup. The worst thing for the P-4 would be if we quit playing them and they only had each other to beat up on.
One of them being the loser in every game would be a nightmare for them
That is leverage that the G-5/? Could use if we would stick together. Of course, there will always be a few who hope to join them in the future and would not be willing to offend them.
So we end up becoming the new FCS just to spite the P5? No thank you. If we think the money is bad now...imagine a world where we are not even in the same league.
Do current FCS games air on TV? That's the world we would live in. We may end up being forced to that being our new reality, but not one I would ever choose. If I'm a G5 AD, I am pushing for a league that is similar to the current basketball situation...where the odds are stacked against us but at least every once in a blue moon a G5 team makes it to the finals.
-
- Posts: 13292
- Joined: November 3rd, 2016, 8:47 pm
- Has thanked: 1367 times
- Been thanked: 2465 times
Re: Proposed Group of 5 Playoff
TV and the Power conference world seemed to not realize that a big part of the MWC plus Oregon State and Washington State would get all the markets at that point which would maximize the money.
- flying_scotsman2.0
- Posts: 3586
- Joined: January 23rd, 2018, 12:29 pm
- Location: The Mighty City-State of Roy, Utah
- Has thanked: 6051 times
- Been thanked: 2285 times
Re: Proposed Group of 5 Playoff
If we really believe the money the MW gets is because of the grace and goodness of the P5, then that's embarrassing, and we should drop down to FCS. The fact is, G5 is probably taking a discounted payout at the playoff level just to be in the conversation with the P5. The MW is a strong league with good football. Let the bottom half of P5 struggle to keep up with the top half, and let's have a conversation in 10 years when their boosters are pissed because they've dropped $100M in NIL to still be a bottom feeder.UStater wrote: ↑April 26th, 2024, 6:02 pmcval wrote: ↑April 26th, 2024, 5:40 pmYup. The worst thing for the P-4 would be if we quit playing them and they only had each other to beat up on.
One of them being the loser in every game would be a nightmare for them
That is leverage that the G-5/? Could use if we would stick together. Of course, there will always be a few who hope to join them in the future and would not be willing to offend them.
So we end up becoming the new FCS just to spite the P5? No thank you. If we think the money is bad now...imagine a world where we are not even in the same league.
Do current FCS games air on TV? That's the world we would live in. We may end up being forced to that being our new reality, but not one I would ever choose. If I'm a G5 AD, I am pushing for a league that is similar to the current basketball situation...where the odds are stacked against us but at least every once in a blue moon a G5 team makes it to the finals.
On the other hand, I totally get the argument for staying in the same division as the big boys. That's obviously the goal. But unless we get big money and big support, we aren't going to be able to keep up. Better to compete at the top end of what we are able to, and grow from there. That's how Boise got to where they are, that's how Utah go to where they are. It's a process, and I just don't think getting caught up in this arms race is going to end well for us. (Spoiler, unless something drastic happens, it's only going to end well for Ohio State, Texas, USC, and Georgia, and maybe 5 other schools, that's about it).
- These users thanked the author flying_scotsman2.0 for the post:
- cval
-
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: November 5th, 2010, 10:10 pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 784 times
- Full
- Posts: 2519
- Joined: April 27th, 2011, 11:07 am
- Location: Davis County
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 437 times
Re: Proposed Group of 5 Playoff
I’m in favor. We are the new FCS. There is the SEC and Big Ten, the next tier is the Big 12 and ACC. If you don’t believe me look at Florida State. The playoff is most likely going to 14 in order to include an additional SEC and Big Ten team. The only reason the top FBS teams haven’t broken off is because they can’t figure out where to draw the line and those that don’t make it have a lot of money to spend on lawyers.
-
- Posts: 3017
- Joined: January 20th, 2011, 7:35 pm
- Location: North Salt Lake
- Has thanked: 769 times
- Been thanked: 868 times
- Full
- Posts: 2519
- Joined: April 27th, 2011, 11:07 am
- Location: Davis County
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 437 times
Re: Proposed Group of 5 Playoff
There is a bit of both. I think it gives G5 conferences some power. I think there is more value in G5 football than Sankey and Tony Petitti, the Big Ten’s Commissioner graciously allow the G5 to receive. They want as much $$$$ as they can extract and don’t care who’s expense it’s at. I think this money would be at least as much as the playoff pays the conferences, and it would hurt the perception of the first round of the new playoff format if there isn’t a Cinderella to root for. Do fans want to watch fourth, fifth, and sixth place Big Ten and SEC teams playing one another.
- RogerAndersen
- Posts: 308
- Joined: December 7th, 2021, 12:56 pm
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 293 times
Re: Proposed Group of 5 Playoff
So let me see if I have this all straight...
If the P4 leagues never have to leave their home stadiums in OOC play due to the massive bowl payouts the P4 conferences and programs collect...
This sounds an awful lot like the G5 leagues are basically stuck playing a P4 programs on the road plus maybe an fcs program at home and peer level (another g5) home and away in OOC every year.
Assuming a fairly positive result/outcome, this sounds very much like a 1-3 start many years, or a 2-2 in the good years.
Making much more than an 8 win season seem quite improbable.
Am I just being too pessimistic?
If the P4 leagues never have to leave their home stadiums in OOC play due to the massive bowl payouts the P4 conferences and programs collect...
This sounds an awful lot like the G5 leagues are basically stuck playing a P4 programs on the road plus maybe an fcs program at home and peer level (another g5) home and away in OOC every year.
Assuming a fairly positive result/outcome, this sounds very much like a 1-3 start many years, or a 2-2 in the good years.
Making much more than an 8 win season seem quite improbable.
Am I just being too pessimistic?
Last edited by RogerAndersen on April 29th, 2024, 5:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- RogerAndersen
- Posts: 308
- Joined: December 7th, 2021, 12:56 pm
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 293 times
Re: Proposed Group of 5 Playoff
To me, this is beginning to feel like what the power conferences want is just a "Bridge too Far".
The P4 keep hogging all the profits and all of the money in College Football. They are all getting rich.
Meanwhile, how can G5 programs break-even?
The deck keeps getting reshuffled to make even having a successful existence as a G5, next to impossible.
So, maybe I have just had a belly full, and don't really want to play their game of charades any longer.
For years, it felt like MWC level competition was a good fit for Utah State.
Now with NIL and Open Transfers, it is starting to feel like Utah State is continually getting our bones picked clean.
Is this really how it is supposed to be?
The P4 keep hogging all the profits and all of the money in College Football. They are all getting rich.
Meanwhile, how can G5 programs break-even?
The deck keeps getting reshuffled to make even having a successful existence as a G5, next to impossible.
So, maybe I have just had a belly full, and don't really want to play their game of charades any longer.
For years, it felt like MWC level competition was a good fit for Utah State.
Now with NIL and Open Transfers, it is starting to feel like Utah State is continually getting our bones picked clean.
Is this really how it is supposed to be?