NAR: SDSU punter exonerated

signalwar · Post by **signalwar** » May 9th, 2023, 7:25 pm

SDSU punter wasn't even there for the alleged rape.
Where does he get his reputation back? And the millions he lost out on?

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/pros ... er-report/

trevordude · Post by **trevordude** » May 9th, 2023, 8:53 pm

After reading the article, is he exonerated because of the one acquaintance eyewitness that saw him leaving? It was a little unclear to me

bill.george · Post by **bill.george** » May 9th, 2023, 9:10 pm

Because he had left an hour before the incident. Tough to prove someone to be in two places at one time

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

AggieUprising50 · Post by **AggieUprising50** » May 10th, 2023, 7:26 am

Although I thought he was kind of a tool at SDSU, he did not deserve this.

I hope he gets another shot at the NFL. He definitely has the talent.

hickaggie · Post by **hickaggie** » May 10th, 2023, 8:18 am

The dangers of being tried by the media. If I understand correctly the investigators had this information including video surveilience from the beginning but didn't release it because of the ongoing investigation. Meanwhile he is sued civilly resulting him losing his job and being hammered in the media. Hope he's given another chance.

tipitup · Post by **tipitup** » May 10th, 2023, 9:28 am

if he left early, why did it take (insert time frame), or how ever long to clear him???? can't you talk to witnesses when it happens and determine that, and not even drag him in? That was a lot of backlash to him and his future because they didn't release the information. Hopefully buffalo knew this, and that that wasn't the main reason he was released.

ratofallaggies · Post by **ratofallaggies** » May 10th, 2023, 9:36 am

tipitup wrote: ↑
May 10th, 2023, 9:28 am
if he left early, why did it take (insert time frame), or how ever long to clear him???? can't you talk to witnesses when it happens and determine that, and not even drag him in? That was a lot of backlash to him and his future because they didn't release the information. Hopefully buffalo knew this, and that that wasn't the main reason he was released.

The Bills didn't care about anything other than completely separating themselves from the situation. Truth plays zero part in situations like this.

USU78 · Post by **USU78** » May 10th, 2023, 9:39 am

There were a few here and on the MWC board (especially there) that wouldn't hear of it on wait and see how the evidence develops. I wonder if any of them feel remotely embarrassed.

GameFAQSAggie · Post by **GameFAQSAggie** » May 10th, 2023, 9:40 am

There are some people that STILL go around thinking Jordan Love was smoking marijuana when the fact is he got the charges dropped.

Aggie formerly in Hawaii · Post by **Aggie formerly in Hawaii** » May 10th, 2023, 10:49 am

GameFAQSAggie wrote: ↑
May 10th, 2023, 9:40 am
There are some people that STILL go around thinking Jordan Love was smoking marijuana when the fact is he got the charges dropped.

The bigger problem is people thinking there is anything wrong with cannabis at all.

BigBlueDart · Post by **BigBlueDart** » May 10th, 2023, 3:19 pm

Aggie formerly in Hawaii wrote: ↑
May 10th, 2023, 10:49 am

GameFAQSAggie wrote: ↑
May 10th, 2023, 9:40 am
There are some people that STILL go around thinking Jordan Love was smoking marijuana when the fact is he got the charges dropped.
The bigger problem is people thinking there is anything wrong with cannabis at all.

I am firmly against cannibalism, and if you had any morality about you at all you would be, too!

QuackAttackAggie · Post by **QuackAttackAggie** » May 10th, 2023, 4:45 pm

ratofallaggies wrote:
tipitup wrote: ↑
May 10th, 2023, 9:28 am
if he left early, why did it take (insert time frame), or how ever long to clear him???? can't you talk to witnesses when it happens and determine that, and not even drag him in? That was a lot of backlash to him and his future because they didn't release the information. Hopefully buffalo knew this, and that that wasn't the main reason he was released.
The Bills didn't care about anything other than completely separating themselves from the situation. Truth plays zero part in situations like this.

The bills actually said they investigated it and found he hadn't done anything wrong but it wasn't worth the PR hit to keep him.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Jjoey52 · Post by **Jjoey52** » May 10th, 2023, 5:10 pm

New American law: Guilty till proven innocent.

breadysmith · Post by **breadysmith** » May 10th, 2023, 5:34 pm

I thought there was some audio of him calling the victim and telling her she should get tested for an STD…or something like that…maybe I’m mistaken. That seemed pretty damning at the time and makes me wonder if there was more to it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

USU78 · Post by **USU78** » May 10th, 2023, 5:37 pm

Jjoey52 wrote: ↑
May 10th, 2023, 5:10 pm
New American law: Guilty till proven innocent.

The New American Can-Doism: Don't nut up, just let the mob denut you.

QuackAttackAggie · Post by **QuackAttackAggie** » May 10th, 2023, 7:19 pm

breadysmith wrote:I thought there was some audio of him calling the victim and telling her she should get tested for an STD…or something like that…maybe I’m mistaken. That seemed pretty damning at the time and makes me wonder if there was more to it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They had sex according to the witnesses. It was just hours before the reported time of the sexual assault and before she was intoxicated.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

stang · Post by **stang** » May 10th, 2023, 7:46 pm

QuackAttackAggie wrote:
breadysmith wrote:I thought there was some audio of him calling the victim and telling her she should get tested for an STD…or something like that…maybe I’m mistaken. That seemed pretty damning at the time and makes me wonder if there was more to it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They had sex according to the witnesses. It was just hours before the reported time of the sexual assault and before she was intoxicated.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And underage, correct?

ratofallaggies · Post by **ratofallaggies** » May 11th, 2023, 6:19 am

stang wrote: ↑
May 10th, 2023, 7:46 pm

QuackAttackAggie wrote:
breadysmith wrote:I thought there was some audio of him calling the victim and telling her she should get tested for an STD…or something like that…maybe I’m mistaken. That seemed pretty damning at the time and makes me wonder if there was more to it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They had sex according to the witnesses. It was just hours before the reported time of the sexual assault and before she was intoxicated.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And underage, correct?

True, multiple witnesses also saying she was telling everyone she was 18.

Upcoming Events

Event Results