Football Home Game
Sat, August 31, 2024
Sat, August 31, 2024
Basketball Home Game
Fri, November 1, 2024
Fri, November 1, 2024
Data to consider
-
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: November 6th, 2010, 9:04 pm
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 924 times
Data to consider
In the last 5 losses at the AFA, AF has shot better from the field than USU.
Over those same years, any wins at AFA showed USU shooting better from the field than AFA.
It is likely the case in most games that the better shooting team wins. But if USU can defend well, I like their chances.
Looking at a lot of other metrics using https://www.usustats.com/, nothing else was absolutely aligned with outcome other than shooting percentage from the field. (I didn't break out 2- point shooting separately.)
P.S. For the most part I enjoy digging through old game results, but it really hurt to see that in the 19-point loss in 2020, AFA won the rebound battle 50-29. OUCH!
Over those same years, any wins at AFA showed USU shooting better from the field than AFA.
It is likely the case in most games that the better shooting team wins. But if USU can defend well, I like their chances.
Looking at a lot of other metrics using https://www.usustats.com/, nothing else was absolutely aligned with outcome other than shooting percentage from the field. (I didn't break out 2- point shooting separately.)
P.S. For the most part I enjoy digging through old game results, but it really hurt to see that in the 19-point loss in 2020, AFA won the rebound battle 50-29. OUCH!
- These users thanked the author SectionBAggie for the post (total 2):
- treesap32 • Bluestar
-
- SJSU Ultimate Loser Award Winner - Given to someone that should probably give up but won't.
- Posts: 23549
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:09 am
- Location: Where the sagebrush grows!
- Has thanked: 1428 times
- Been thanked: 3289 times
Re: Data to consider
I remember shooting some crazy low three point percentage one year, like 1-15 or something. I believe we lost that one as well.
-
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: November 6th, 2010, 9:04 pm
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 924 times
Re: Data to consider
2 seasons ago we lost 49-47 while shooting 1-19 from 3.
Amazingly, that wasn't the worst loss. That would have been the 79-60 loss four years ago. We shot pretty well from three (10-28), but gave up 58% FG shooting inside the arc and lost the rebound comparison 50-29. It was an awful performance.
- These users thanked the author SectionBAggie for the post:
- cdaAg
-
- Posts: 988
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:41 am
- Location: Perry, enfin
- Has thanked: 2172 times
- Been thanked: 411 times
Re: Data to consider
If I'm thinking of the same one, that was in Odom's 1st season here. We were down two with the ball at the end of the game and were coming out of a timeout. We were 1/18 from 3 at that point. The play that was drawn up? A 28-footer that missed badly and sealed the loss. I was so frustrated about that being what we chose to do.
-
- Posts: 988
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:41 am
- Location: Perry, enfin
- Has thanked: 2172 times
- Been thanked: 411 times
Re: Data to consider
Sorry SectionB, I didn't see your post while I was typing mine. Such a frustrating game.
-
- Posts: 2703
- Joined: November 5th, 2010, 10:09 am
- Has thanked: 106 times
- Been thanked: 726 times
Re: Data to consider
I've been to most of the games on the let 10 years and we always seem to struggle shooting at AFA. I'm not worried with this team because we struggle every night but make up for it on other ways. Last year if we didn't hit our 3s we had nothing else, this year we win with everything else. I don't see us having a pricked winning this year. They simply do not have anyone to guard Osobor and they will struggle getting off any good shots.
- Real Life Aggie
- Posts: 4002
- Joined: April 10th, 2019, 4:28 pm
- Location: Tucson, AZ
- Has thanked: 5371 times
- Been thanked: 1860 times
Re: Data to consider
Was that the whole team, or just Brock Miller?
- These users thanked the author Real Life Aggie for the post (total 2):
- JFWAggie • AggieBlues
- Mr. Sneelock
- Posts: 7020
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:09 am
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 775 times
Re: Data to consider
Man, Brock Miller. Everyone always gushed about what a great shooter he was, but I swear he had a shooting slump that lasted about 2 years.
- These users thanked the author Mr. Sneelock for the post:
- AggieBlues
Formerly TulsAGGIE
- flying_scotsman2.0
- Posts: 3598
- Joined: January 23rd, 2018, 12:29 pm
- Location: The Mighty City-State of Roy, Utah
- Has thanked: 6065 times
- Been thanked: 2297 times
Re: Data to consider
It was always an aerodynamics issue.Mr. Sneelock wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2024, 10:48 amMan, Brock Miller. Everyone always gushed about what a great shooter he was, but I swear he had a shooting slump that lasted about 2 years.
-
- Posts: 949
- Joined: November 5th, 2020, 5:28 pm
- Has thanked: 154 times
- Been thanked: 617 times
Re: Data to consider
I'm very worried about this game. It has all the makings of a trap game: early afternoon road game, against an inferior opponent, after a long break, and with a huge look ahead game (CSU) next up. Hopefully Sprinkle has the guys ready.
- 3rdGenAggie
- Pick'em Champ - '16 Kickoff
- Posts: 12476
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:53 pm
- Location: The City of the Salty Lake
- Has thanked: 4131 times
- Been thanked: 2418 times
Re: Data to consider
Brock was a fine shooter, but not great.Mr. Sneelock wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2024, 10:48 amMan, Brock Miller. Everyone always gushed about what a great shooter he was, but I swear he had a shooting slump that lasted about 2 years.
He shot 34% from three for his career, but was streaky over the course of whole seasons (probably related to health).
17-18 (5 games): 47.4%
18-19: 35.4%
19-20: 30.5%
20-21: 36.5%
21-22: 31.4%
- These users thanked the author 3rdGenAggie for the post:
- AGinNEIowa
"I have no idea what I'm doing, but I know I'm doing it really, really well." -Andy Dwyer
-
- SJSU Ultimate Loser Award Winner - Given to someone that should probably give up but won't.
- Posts: 23549
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:09 am
- Location: Where the sagebrush grows!
- Has thanked: 1428 times
- Been thanked: 3289 times
Re: Data to consider
Brock Miller would be a top shooter on our current roster. Also, I hated when Brock would square up for a shot.
- MrBiggle
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: October 10th, 2013, 12:15 pm
- Has thanked: 2898 times
- Been thanked: 538 times
Re: Data to consider
IIRC he usually had a bac brace with TENs built in during game time. During warm ups he would legit make around 90% of his shots, then came the head band during playing time and % would drop...3rdGenAggie wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2024, 11:02 amBrock was a fine shooter, but not great.Mr. Sneelock wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2024, 10:48 amMan, Brock Miller. Everyone always gushed about what a great shooter he was, but I swear he had a shooting slump that lasted about 2 years.
He shot 34% from three for his career, but was streaky over the course of whole seasons (probably related to health).
17-18 (5 games): 47.4%
18-19: 35.4%
19-20: 30.5%
20-21: 36.5%
21-22: 31.4%
Where only sage brush grows
-
- Posts: 9625
- Joined: September 12th, 2018, 2:01 pm
- Has thanked: 3121 times
- Been thanked: 4492 times
Re: Data to consider
I really don't think it is a trap game. The team has been off for 10 days and has solely been able to prepare for AF. If we lose i don't think it is because we were looking forward to CSU. It is the first game of conference play the team will be solely focused on AF and starting off in the right way. If we lose it is because we could not make enough shots etc., but don't think it will be due to looking ahead.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: February 4th, 2023, 6:08 pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Data to consider
AF likes to pass to shoot, 8th in assists/fg. If we can just limit this and rebound we are fine. They are almost dead last in the country in offensive rebounds per game at 6 pg. They have decent shooting percentages but don't take many shots which could account for the low offensive rebounds.