Football Home Game
Sat, August 31, 2024
Sat, August 31, 2024
Basketball Home Game
Fri, November 1, 2024
Fri, November 1, 2024
Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
- USU78
- Pick'em Champ - '16 Weekly
- Posts: 15461
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 6:43 am
- Location: Sandy
- Has thanked: 7207 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
From USU's official website:
Things haven't ever changed. A good argument can be made that the pukes' mission statement can be reduced to two words: Screw USU.
https://www.usu.edu/about/history/1907 Fearing that the growth of the UAC will hinder the University of Utah's progress, legislators in Salt Lake City attempt to consolidate the two schools, and upon failing, instead pass a bill limiting UAC's curriculum to agriculture, domestic science, and mechanic arts. Many once-thriving programs in the arts, humanities, education, and others are closed, despite the college's initial mandate that it offer such instruction. By 1927, all curricular restrictions except law and medicine are lifted.
Things haven't ever changed. A good argument can be made that the pukes' mission statement can be reduced to two words: Screw USU.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
- ViAggie
- Posts: 24960
- Joined: June 16th, 2011, 6:49 pm
- Location: Temecula, California
- Has thanked: 6209 times
- Been thanked: 2577 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
Maybe it’s because the Ewe is not filled with a bunch of whiny self righteous A holes.
Oh wait
Never mind
Oh wait
Never mind
- These users thanked the author usublue20 for the post (total 3):
- USU78 • aggies22 • DaKineKane
-
- Posts: 545
- Joined: November 26th, 2013, 7:35 pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
I've always put it this way: I hate BYU fans (even though Ute fans are getting worse every year), and Utah's administration equally.
- These users thanked the author UStateTim for the post (total 4):
- USU78 • aggies22 • NVAggie • DaKineKane
- dyedblue
- Posts: 8445
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 854 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
I can't stand either one of them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
“The winning team has a dedication. It will have a core of veteran players who set the standards. They will not accept defeat.” --Merlin Olsen
-
- Posts: 1178
- Joined: November 27th, 2013, 10:16 am
- Has thanked: 368 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
Somehow I am over what happened in 1907. Have no problem with the Utes and no use for BYU.
- These users thanked the author gomretat for the post:
- DaKineKane
-
- Posts: 3945
- Joined: December 13th, 2010, 10:07 pm
- Location: Salem, Oregon
- Has thanked: 695 times
- Been thanked: 1212 times
- Contact:
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
This pretty much sums it up. The people at BYU are insufferable. But for most of the last 50 years, institutionally, the U has done far more to hurt Utah State.
A pox on both their houses.
- These users thanked the author LKGates for the post (total 4):
- USU78 • aggies22 • CodingAggieBlue • NVAggie
Freelance adventurer and international man of mystery.
-
- Posts: 3945
- Joined: December 13th, 2010, 10:07 pm
- Location: Salem, Oregon
- Has thanked: 695 times
- Been thanked: 1212 times
- Contact:
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
Yeah, it didn't stop in 1907. In 1960 they destroyed the Skyline Conference, and cut Utah State out of the WAC. They consistently blocked our entry to the WAC/MWC until they left for the PAC. Now, they won't play us. And those are the things that are in plain sight.
Freelance adventurer and international man of mystery.
-
- Posts: 1178
- Joined: November 27th, 2013, 10:16 am
- Has thanked: 368 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
They Utes have nothing to gain by playing us. We may not like that but it is true.LKGates wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 12:22 amYeah, it didn't stop in 1907. In 1960 they destroyed the Skyline Conference, and cut Utah State out of the WAC. They consistently blocked our entry to the WAC/MWC until they left for the PAC. Now, they won't play us. And those are the things that are in plain sight.
-
- RIP
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 4:34 pm
- Has thanked: 922 times
- Been thanked: 355 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
That is true, however they also have nothing to gain by playing YBU or Wyoming in football, but in Utah the one they are forced to play is YBU.gomretat wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 7:52 amThey Utes have nothing to gain by playing us. We may not like that but it is true.LKGates wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 12:22 amYeah, it didn't stop in 1907. In 1960 they destroyed the Skyline Conference, and cut Utah State out of the WAC. They consistently blocked our entry to the WAC/MWC until they left for the PAC. Now, they won't play us. And those are the things that are in plain sight.
The series with USU got changed after the 2012 loss in Logan, that speaks volumes of what they are all about. That would be like USU dumping Weber in basketball if we lost 3 in a row
- These users thanked the author oleblu111 for the post:
- Aggiefan33
-
- Posts: 1178
- Joined: November 27th, 2013, 10:16 am
- Has thanked: 368 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
I think they have reasons why they need to play BYU which is clear. They will always have filler teams like Wyoming that are needed to fill their schedule. The difference is there is much more to lose by playing us that the Wyomings of the world.
-
- RIP
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 4:34 pm
- Has thanked: 922 times
- Been thanked: 355 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
That is correct, and that is why they are cowards, and get little respect from me.
-
- Posts: 9584
- Joined: September 12th, 2018, 2:01 pm
- Has thanked: 3097 times
- Been thanked: 4458 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
I can somewhat understand the argument of not wanting to play us in football although when they scheduled San Jose and Northern Illinois to home-and-home that kind of threw that out the window. What I cannot understand and is unforgivable is why they would not schedule home-and-home in basketball they play so many games in basketball playing US every year in basketball will not hurt their schedule.
-
- Posts: 3534
- Joined: November 5th, 2010, 3:14 pm
- Has thanked: 499 times
- Been thanked: 706 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
Is that why they want to play SJS home and home? Ridiculous! If you have nothing against the Utes, I suspect you are a closet Ute fan. No good self respecting Aggie should want anything to do with those pompous creeps, given what they have done to us over the years, and continue to do so,IMO.gomretat wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 7:52 amThey Utes have nothing to gain by playing us. We may not like that but it is true.LKGates wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 12:22 amYeah, it didn't stop in 1907. In 1960 they destroyed the Skyline Conference, and cut Utah State out of the WAC. They consistently blocked our entry to the WAC/MWC until they left for the PAC. Now, they won't play us. And those are the things that are in plain sight.
- justinmorrey
- Posts: 691
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:29 am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
Since leaving Utah almost a decade ago, I have softened on BYU compared to Utah. Still don’t like BYU but Utah is clearly the bigger enemy to USU I’m my view.
- These users thanked the author justinmorrey for the post (total 4):
- USU78 • oleblu111 • NavyBlueAggie • donlarson8
-
- Posts: 3534
- Joined: November 5th, 2010, 3:14 pm
- Has thanked: 499 times
- Been thanked: 706 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
Amenjustinmorrey wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 9:46 amSince leaving Utah almost a decade ago, I have softened on BYU compared to Utah. Still don’t like BYU but Utah is clearly the bigger enemy to USU I’m my view.
- JSHarvey
- Posts: 2247
- Joined: April 2nd, 2013, 12:45 pm
- Location: Sandy, UT
- Has thanked: 3546 times
- Been thanked: 352 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
U of U is a threat from a fiscal and legislative perspective (and is now irrelevant from a sports perspective as they will never play us again). BYU is a threat on the conference and sports side.
Both have cost USU dearly over many many decades.
Both have cost USU dearly over many many decades.
Last edited by JSHarvey on May 18th, 2019, 9:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The purpose of education is not to validate ignorance but to overcome it." Lawrence Krauss
"Thinking is the hardest work there is, that's why so few people do it!" Henry Ford
"Thinking is the hardest work there is, that's why so few people do it!" Henry Ford
- USU78
- Pick'em Champ - '16 Weekly
- Posts: 15461
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 6:43 am
- Location: Sandy
- Has thanked: 7207 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
Oh, wahhh. The poor babies.gomretat wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 7:52 amThey Utes have nothing to gain by playing us. We may not like that but it is true.LKGates wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 12:22 amYeah, it didn't stop in 1907. In 1960 they destroyed the Skyline Conference, and cut Utah State out of the WAC. They consistently blocked our entry to the WAC/MWC until they left for the PAC. Now, they won't play us. And those are the things that are in plain sight.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
-
- Posts: 3945
- Joined: December 13th, 2010, 10:07 pm
- Location: Salem, Oregon
- Has thanked: 695 times
- Been thanked: 1212 times
- Contact:
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
So what. The same could be said of several same state pairings; Oregon / Oregon State, Michigan / Michigan State, Washington / Washington State, North Carolina / North Carolina State. You can argue that those teams are in the same conference, but what about Texas / Texas A&M, Florida / Florida State, Iowa / Iowa State? The fact is, with in state rivalries, the relationship is never completely equal, and one school always has "nothing to gain" by playing the historically weaker program. Does that mean the rivalry should just be dead and buried? I would hope not. It is a travesty that the Utes killed one of the longest running in state rivalry series in the nation. I hope one day, with the continued decline of BYU and rise of Utah State, the fans, media, and perhaps the legislature will force the issue in Utah.gomretat wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 7:52 amThey Utes have nothing to gain by playing us. We may not like that but it is true.LKGates wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 12:22 amYeah, it didn't stop in 1907. In 1960 they destroyed the Skyline Conference, and cut Utah State out of the WAC. They consistently blocked our entry to the WAC/MWC until they left for the PAC. Now, they won't play us. And those are the things that are in plain sight.
Cowardly, perfidious Utes!
Freelance adventurer and international man of mystery.
-
- Posts: 1564
- Joined: December 26th, 2010, 8:43 am
- Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 542 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
Texas and Texas A&M no longer play each other. Texas initially canceled the series after A&M left the Big-12 for the SEC. Recently Texas reached out to A&M for a short series in the early 2020s, but A&M said no.LKGates wrote: ↑May 18th, 2019, 8:25 pmSo what. The same could be said of several same state pairings; Oregon / Oregon State, Michigan / Michigan State, Washington / Washington State, North Carolina / North Carolina State. You can argue that those teams are in the same conference, but what about Texas / Texas A&M, Florida / Florida State, Iowa / Iowa State? The fact is, with in state rivalries, the relationship is never completely equal, and one school always has "nothing to gain" by playing the historically weaker program. Does that mean the rivalry should just be dead and buried? I would hope not. It is a travesty that the Utes killed one of the longest running in state rivalry series in the nation. I hope one day, with the continued decline of BYU and rise of Utah State, the fans, media, and perhaps the legislature will force the issue in Utah.gomretat wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 7:52 amThey Utes have nothing to gain by playing us. We may not like that but it is true.LKGates wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 12:22 amYeah, it didn't stop in 1907. In 1960 they destroyed the Skyline Conference, and cut Utah State out of the WAC. They consistently blocked our entry to the WAC/MWC until they left for the PAC. Now, they won't play us. And those are the things that are in plain sight.
Cowardly, perfidious Utes!
Georgia and Georgia Tech also play every year and are in different conferences.
I do think if USU were in a P5 conference, say the Big-12, you'd see USU play Utah every year.
- thegreendalegelf
- Posts: 993
- Joined: August 18th, 2017, 3:26 pm
- Has thanked: 969 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
Utah doesn't feel like they need to play us to claim superiority. If we were P5, they would have to prove that they were better. Right now the nation sees Utah above USU, they put that on the line by playing us.swordsman1989 wrote: ↑May 20th, 2019, 2:50 amTexas and Texas A&M no longer play each other. Texas initially canceled the series after A&M left the Big-12 for the SEC. Recently Texas reached out to A&M for a short series in the early 2020s, but A&M said no.LKGates wrote: ↑May 18th, 2019, 8:25 pmSo what. The same could be said of several same state pairings; Oregon / Oregon State, Michigan / Michigan State, Washington / Washington State, North Carolina / North Carolina State. You can argue that those teams are in the same conference, but what about Texas / Texas A&M, Florida / Florida State, Iowa / Iowa State? The fact is, with in state rivalries, the relationship is never completely equal, and one school always has "nothing to gain" by playing the historically weaker program. Does that mean the rivalry should just be dead and buried? I would hope not. It is a travesty that the Utes killed one of the longest running in state rivalry series in the nation. I hope one day, with the continued decline of BYU and rise of Utah State, the fans, media, and perhaps the legislature will force the issue in Utah.gomretat wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 7:52 amThey Utes have nothing to gain by playing us. We may not like that but it is true.LKGates wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 12:22 amYeah, it didn't stop in 1907. In 1960 they destroyed the Skyline Conference, and cut Utah State out of the WAC. They consistently blocked our entry to the WAC/MWC until they left for the PAC. Now, they won't play us. And those are the things that are in plain sight.
Cowardly, perfidious Utes!
Georgia and Georgia Tech also play every year and are in different conferences.
I do think if USU were in a P5 conference, say the Big-12, you'd see USU play Utah every year.
Imagine if Weber State beat us, then played us down to the wire the next two times we played them. Then Weber says, we want to play yearly. People here would call for playing SUU, Dixie State, Idaho State or other FCS teams.
- USU78
- Pick'em Champ - '16 Weekly
- Posts: 15461
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 6:43 am
- Location: Sandy
- Has thanked: 7207 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
1892 through 2009. That is how long USU and Utah played, pretty much annually. Over 100 games. That's a rare thing. To compare the ephemeral Weebe series to our series with the pukes is irrational.thegreendalegelf wrote: ↑May 20th, 2019, 9:43 amUtah doesn't feel like they need to play us to claim superiority. If we were P5, they would have to prove that they were better. Right now the nation sees Utah above USU, they put that on the line by playing us.swordsman1989 wrote: ↑May 20th, 2019, 2:50 amTexas and Texas A&M no longer play each other. Texas initially canceled the series after A&M left the Big-12 for the SEC. Recently Texas reached out to A&M for a short series in the early 2020s, but A&M said no.LKGates wrote: ↑May 18th, 2019, 8:25 pmSo what. The same could be said of several same state pairings; Oregon / Oregon State, Michigan / Michigan State, Washington / Washington State, North Carolina / North Carolina State. You can argue that those teams are in the same conference, but what about Texas / Texas A&M, Florida / Florida State, Iowa / Iowa State? The fact is, with in state rivalries, the relationship is never completely equal, and one school always has "nothing to gain" by playing the historically weaker program. Does that mean the rivalry should just be dead and buried? I would hope not. It is a travesty that the Utes killed one of the longest running in state rivalry series in the nation. I hope one day, with the continued decline of BYU and rise of Utah State, the fans, media, and perhaps the legislature will force the issue in Utah.gomretat wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 7:52 amThey Utes have nothing to gain by playing us. We may not like that but it is true.LKGates wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 12:22 amYeah, it didn't stop in 1907. In 1960 they destroyed the Skyline Conference, and cut Utah State out of the WAC. They consistently blocked our entry to the WAC/MWC until they left for the PAC. Now, they won't play us. And those are the things that are in plain sight.
Cowardly, perfidious Utes!
Georgia and Georgia Tech also play every year and are in different conferences.
I do think if USU were in a P5 conference, say the Big-12, you'd see USU play Utah every year.
Imagine if Weber State beat us, then played us down to the wire the next two times we played them. Then Weber says, we want to play yearly. People here would call for playing SUU, Dixie State, Idaho State or other FCS teams.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
-
- RIP
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 4:34 pm
- Has thanked: 922 times
- Been thanked: 355 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
Of course Weber did beat us in football, yet the series continued, if we did as the ewe did we would have dropped them, in both football and basketball. Weber has told us that they wanted to not play us as often in football that is why they are not on the schedule.thegreendalegelf wrote: ↑May 20th, 2019, 9:43 amUtah doesn't feel like they need to play us to claim superiority. If we were P5, they would have to prove that they were better. Right now the nation sees Utah above USU, they put that on the line by playing us.swordsman1989 wrote: ↑May 20th, 2019, 2:50 amTexas and Texas A&M no longer play each other. Texas initially canceled the series after A&M left the Big-12 for the SEC. Recently Texas reached out to A&M for a short series in the early 2020s, but A&M said no.LKGates wrote: ↑May 18th, 2019, 8:25 pmSo what. The same could be said of several same state pairings; Oregon / Oregon State, Michigan / Michigan State, Washington / Washington State, North Carolina / North Carolina State. You can argue that those teams are in the same conference, but what about Texas / Texas A&M, Florida / Florida State, Iowa / Iowa State? The fact is, with in state rivalries, the relationship is never completely equal, and one school always has "nothing to gain" by playing the historically weaker program. Does that mean the rivalry should just be dead and buried? I would hope not. It is a travesty that the Utes killed one of the longest running in state rivalry series in the nation. I hope one day, with the continued decline of BYU and rise of Utah State, the fans, media, and perhaps the legislature will force the issue in Utah.gomretat wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 7:52 amThey Utes have nothing to gain by playing us. We may not like that but it is true.LKGates wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 12:22 amYeah, it didn't stop in 1907. In 1960 they destroyed the Skyline Conference, and cut Utah State out of the WAC. They consistently blocked our entry to the WAC/MWC until they left for the PAC. Now, they won't play us. And those are the things that are in plain sight.
Cowardly, perfidious Utes!
Georgia and Georgia Tech also play every year and are in different conferences.
I do think if USU were in a P5 conference, say the Big-12, you'd see USU play Utah every year.
Imagine if Weber State beat us, then played us down to the wire the next two times we played them. Then Weber says, we want to play yearly. People here would call for playing SUU, Dixie State, Idaho State or other FCS teams.
LaDell Anderson has been very outspoken about the damage done to USU by the Utes, he should know as he was a coach at Utah, BYU, and USU, as well as the A.D. at USU. They also tried to drop BYU but where stopped by state government.
- 2004AG
- Posts: 12466
- Joined: November 16th, 2010, 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 805 times
- Been thanked: 1609 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
That’s not a good analogy. Weber State and Utah State don’t play in the same division.thegreendalegelf wrote:Utah doesn't feel like they need to play us to claim superiority. If we were P5, they would have to prove that they were better. Right now the nation sees Utah above USU, they put that on the line by playing us.swordsman1989 wrote: ↑May 20th, 2019, 2:50 amTexas and Texas A&M no longer play each other. Texas initially canceled the series after A&M left the Big-12 for the SEC. Recently Texas reached out to A&M for a short series in the early 2020s, but A&M said no.LKGates wrote: ↑May 18th, 2019, 8:25 pmSo what. The same could be said of several same state pairings; Oregon / Oregon State, Michigan / Michigan State, Washington / Washington State, North Carolina / North Carolina State. You can argue that those teams are in the same conference, but what about Texas / Texas A&M, Florida / Florida State, Iowa / Iowa State? The fact is, with in state rivalries, the relationship is never completely equal, and one school always has "nothing to gain" by playing the historically weaker program. Does that mean the rivalry should just be dead and buried? I would hope not. It is a travesty that the Utes killed one of the longest running in state rivalry series in the nation. I hope one day, with the continued decline of BYU and rise of Utah State, the fans, media, and perhaps the legislature will force the issue in Utah.gomretat wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 7:52 amThey Utes have nothing to gain by playing us. We may not like that but it is true.LKGates wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 12:22 amYeah, it didn't stop in 1907. In 1960 they destroyed the Skyline Conference, and cut Utah State out of the WAC. They consistently blocked our entry to the WAC/MWC until they left for the PAC. Now, they won't play us. And those are the things that are in plain sight.
Cowardly, perfidious Utes!
Georgia and Georgia Tech also play every year and are in different conferences.
I do think if USU were in a P5 conference, say the Big-12, you'd see USU play Utah every year.
Imagine if Weber State beat us, then played us down to the wire the next two times we played them. Then Weber says, we want to play yearly. People here would call for playing SUU, Dixie State, Idaho State or other FCS teams.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- RIP
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 4:34 pm
- Has thanked: 922 times
- Been thanked: 355 times
Re: Why Utah, not yBu is USU's Institutional Enemy
2004AG wrote: ↑May 20th, 2019, 11:03 amThat’s not a good analogy. Weber State and Utah State don’t play in the same division.thegreendalegelf wrote:Utah doesn't feel like they need to play us to claim superiority. If we were P5, they would have to prove that they were better. Right now the nation sees Utah above USU, they put that on the line by playing us.swordsman1989 wrote: ↑May 20th, 2019, 2:50 amTexas and Texas A&M no longer play each other. Texas initially canceled the series after A&M left the Big-12 for the SEC. Recently Texas reached out to A&M for a short series in the early 2020s, but A&M said no.LKGates wrote: ↑May 18th, 2019, 8:25 pmSo what. The same could be said of several same state pairings; Oregon / Oregon State, Michigan / Michigan State, Washington / Washington State, North Carolina / North Carolina State. You can argue that those teams are in the same conference, but what about Texas / Texas A&M, Florida / Florida State, Iowa / Iowa State? The fact is, with in state rivalries, the relationship is never completely equal, and one school always has "nothing to gain" by playing the historically weaker program. Does that mean the rivalry should just be dead and buried? I would hope not. It is a travesty that the Utes killed one of the longest running in state rivalry series in the nation. I hope one day, with the continued decline of BYU and rise of Utah State, the fans, media, and perhaps the legislature will force the issue in Utah.gomretat wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 7:52 amThey Utes have nothing to gain by playing us. We may not like that but it is true.LKGates wrote: ↑May 17th, 2019, 12:22 amYeah, it didn't stop in 1907. In 1960 they destroyed the Skyline Conference, and cut Utah State out of the WAC. They consistently blocked our entry to the WAC/MWC until they left for the PAC. Now, they won't play us. And those are the things that are in plain sight.
Cowardly, perfidious Utes!
Georgia and Georgia Tech also play every year and are in different conferences.
I do think if USU were in a P5 conference, say the Big-12, you'd see USU play Utah every year.
Imagine if Weber State beat us, then played us down to the wire the next two times we played them. Then Weber says, we want to play yearly. People here would call for playing SUU, Dixie State, Idaho State or other FCS teams.
I believe that if Weber was to beat us, and play us close the next two times I would want to schedule them much more, not drop them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk